Nathan Brink wrote:
> Hello SA Users,
>
> Our software uses SpamAssassin to score various content, but the
> score below doesn't make much sense: "2.6 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is
> 100% natural?!"
>
> Anyone familiar with this or have insight? Also, if there is any
> documentation on scoring, ple
users
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:27
AM
Subject: RE: Spamassassin munging
headers
Hello SA Users,
Our software
uses SpamAssassin to score various content, but the score below doesn't
make much sense:
"2.6
ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?
There was a bug in spamass-milter 0.3.0:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaMilter030CorruptMsgs . Surely
spamass-milter has fixed it by now?
There's a patch there to fix the bug, which would be a better thing
to do than remove the header markup as a workaround...
--j.
Hardy, Anthony writes
Title: Scalix message content
Hello SA Users,
Our software uses
SpamAssassin to score various content, but the score below doesn't make
much sense:
"2.6
ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!"
Anyone familiar with this or have insight? Also, if there is any documentation on
scoring,
