Sven Juergensen (KielNET) wrote:
Hello Matt,
turns out that the script supplied by the
designers of the whole mess is, well,
suboptimal. I kicked it entirely and used
a single command line to run a per-recipient
checking.
Just for info: whenever spamc can't find
the $recipient or is lacking a '
Hello Matt,
turns out that the script supplied by the
designers of the whole mess is, well,
suboptimal. I kicked it entirely and used
a single command line to run a per-recipient
checking.
Just for info: whenever spamc can't find
the $recipient or is lacking a '-u', it
falls back to the process o
Sven Juergensen (KielNET) wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> i was posting this subject a while
> ago and recently had some time to
> look into it some more.
>
> Apparently, whenever $SOMETHING isn't
> part of the envelope and/or body,
> spamassassin falls back to the user
> which is owning the process.
Spamass
