Alan Au wrote:
> Hi Mr. Matt,
>
> Thanks a lot for replying me. I have some thing to clarify. Please see
> below :
>
> We forward a wrongly classifed email as attachement (RFC822) . Will it
> be OK for SpamAssassin to learn?
If you strip the attachment and feed that to SA, yes.
If you feed the
Maybe.
If the ENTIRE email is attached, all header lines and all body lines, in a
format that can be easily extracted then "yes" is a possibility. You will
probably have to write the automatic extraction tool to get the attachment
out of the forwarded email and feed it to salearn.
{^_^}
- Ori
Hi Mr. Matt, Thanks a lot for replying me. I have some thing to clarify. Please see below : We forward a wrongly classifed email as attachement (RFC822) . Will it be OK for SpamAssassin to learn? Regards, Alan Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Alan Au wrote:> Hi all,> > In
Alan Au wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In :
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesInSpamAssassin, it is stated
> that :
>
> It's OK to feed emails with Spamassassin markup into the sa-learn
> command -- sa-learn will ignore any standard Spamassassin headers, and
> if the original email has been enca
