Re: Spamassassin Database Question

2008-03-19 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, John Hardin wrote: You don't *need* to retain the trained messages, but I believe it is a good idea to retrain your training corpus. Dammit. *retain*, not *retrain*. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic

Re: Spamassassin Database Question

2008-03-19 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, James wrote: When training spamassassin with new spam and ham mails does the database need an existing copy of the emails you trained it with in order to work? You don't *need* to retain the trained messages, but I believe it is a good idea to retrain your training corpu

Re: Spamassassin Database Question

2008-03-19 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 18:54:24 James wrote: > i use sa-learn and train it with say 6k emails. > i delete the original emails. > Does the database need to read anything from those emails or is it ok to > get rid of them? you could as well just pipe the mails to sa-learn, which doesn't take any

RE: Spamassassin Database Question

2008-03-19 Thread Jean-Paul Natola
Hi everyone, I've tried looking this up and i dunno if i missed the part about the explanation or not but i couldn't find it. When training spamassassin with new spam and ham mails does the database need an existing copy of the emails you trained it with in order to work? For instance: i use