Re: spamassassin 3.1.8 fine tuning

2007-03-19 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Praveen Kumar wrote: Hi ALL, I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's working fine but success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%). How can i fine tune to get best results? A setup that is only catching 20-25% of spam usually has a config problem.

Re: spamassassin 3.1.8 fine tuning

2007-03-19 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Monday 19 March 2007 09:22, ram wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:20 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote: > > Hi ALL, > > > > I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's > > working fine but > > > > success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%). > > > > How can i fine t

Re: spamassassin 3.1.8 fine tuning

2007-03-19 Thread ram
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:20 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote: > Hi ALL, > > I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's > working fine but > > success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%). > > How can i fine tune to get best results? > > TIA, Use rules_du_jour.

Re: spamassassin 3.1.8 fine tuning

2007-03-18 Thread John Andersen
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Praveen Kumar wrote: > Txs John for your quick resp. > > Yes, i did installing of all the plugins thru CPAN > do i need to set path of these .pm files anywhere in any of conf files so > that spamassassing looks that specific path for plugins? The plugins just use other sof

Re: spamassassin 3.1.8 fine tuning

2007-03-18 Thread Praveen Kumar
Txs John for your quick resp. Yes, i did installing of all the plugins thru CPAN do i need to set path of these .pm files anywhere in any of conf files so that spamassassing looks that specific path for plugins? Could you please help me in training bayes? Can somebody share the configuration fi

Re: spamassassin 3.1.8 fine tuning

2007-03-18 Thread John Andersen
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Praveen Kumar wrote: > use_razor2 1 Did you actually install and configure razor? Having the plugin is not enough. Also, you have to train bayes with a couple hundred spams and hams (specifically telling it which is which) before it becomes effective. -- ___

Re: Spamassassin 3.1.8

2007-03-08 Thread John Andersen
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, SAtalk Mail User wrote: > Hello All, > > I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy > quiestion, When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin > 3.1.7 is installed / running Why is that? I did the following --> > downloaded Mail-Spamas

RE: Spamassassin 3.1.8

2007-03-06 Thread R Lists06
> I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy > quiestion, > When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin 3.1.7 is > installed / running > Why is that? I did the following --> downloaded Mail-SpamassAssin- > 3.1.8.tar.gz and installed > by perl Makefile.PL /

Re: Spamassassin 3.1.8

2007-03-06 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:08:59PM -0600, SAtalk Mail User wrote: > stopped the current spamd and restarted and it shows that 3.1.7 in the header. I would guess that your install didn't happen correctly. Sounds like you have one version installed and probably installed 3.1.8 to a different locati