Am 30.09.2014 um 02:40 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman:
> I looked at those emails again and tried to resolve the sender’s addresses
> (dig -x z.z.z.z). They don’t resolve to
> valid hostnames, which means they should even reach SA. Postfix should reject
> them outright. I’ve changed a couple
> of postf
On Sep 29, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Mark London wrote:
> On 9/29/2014 12:58 PM, Mark London wrote:
>> On 9/29/2014 4:21 AM, users-digest-h...@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Lorenzo Thurman
>>> Date: 9/26/2014 10:59 PM
>>> I’ve been using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent
From: Mark London [mailto:m...@psfc.mit.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:59 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassasin not as effective anymore
On 9/29/2014 12:58 PM, Mark London wrote:
On 9/29/2014 4:21 AM,
users-digest-h...@spamassassin.apache.org<mailto:us
On 9/29/2014 12:58 PM, Mark London wrote:
On 9/29/2014 4:21 AM, users-digest-help@spamassassin.apache.orgwrote:
From:
Lorenzo Thurman
Date:
9/26/2014 10:59 PM
I’ve been using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results. But,
now over the last month or so, it has been scoring spam
On 9/29/2014 4:21 AM, users-digest-h...@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
From:
Lorenzo Thurman
Date:
9/26/2014 10:59 PM
I’ve been using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results. But,
now over the last month or so, it has been scoring spam very low. It still
catches most spam, bu
On 09/29/2014 05:27 PM, Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
I’ve created a paste bin with a couple of sample emails here:
http://pastebin.com/KfYrGMm8
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, replace this with
zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, This is included in
I’ve created a paste bin with a couple of sample emails here:
http://pastebin.com/KfYrGMm8
I’m running spam assassin on a my Mail server Ubuntu 14.04. I use postfix as my
MTA. Spamassasin is at 3.4.0, with razor and I have these recipient
restrictions set in postfix:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
I’ve be using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results.
I recently updated my SA version to 3.4.0_13 and found that it caught
much more than it had been. It’s not enough to run sa-update, you need
to keep the install version up to date as well.
Just updated SA to 3.4.0 on C
On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:41 , Jason Haar wrote:
> On 29/09/14 04:11, LuKreme wrote:
>> I recently updated my SA version to 3.4.0_13 and found that it caught
>> much more than it had been. It’s not enough to run sa-update, you need
>> to keep the install version up to date as well.
>
> What is 3.4.0
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:41:57 +1300
Jason Haar wrote:
> On 29/09/14 04:11, LuKreme wrote:
> > I recently updated my SA version to 3.4.0_13 and found that it
> > caught much more than it had been. It?s not enough to run
> > sa-update, you need to keep the install version up to date as well.
>
> Wh
On 29/09/14 04:11, LuKreme wrote:
> I recently updated my SA version to 3.4.0_13 and found that it caught
> much more than it had been. It’s not enough to run sa-update, you need
> to keep the install version up to date as well.
What is 3.4.0_13? The version on the home website is still 3.4.0? Is
On 26 Sep 2014, at 20:59 , Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
> I’ve be using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results.
I recently updated my SA version to 3.4.0_13 and found that it caught much more
than it had been. It’s not enough to run sa-update, you need to keep the
install version up
On 09/27/2014 04:59 AM, Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
I’ve be using spamassasin for a number of years with excellent results. But,
now over the last month or so, it has been scoring spam very low. It still
catches most spam, but whereas only about a dozen or so might get through to my
inbox in a week
13 matches
Mail list logo
