Re: SpamAssassin and LaTeX

2007-12-06 Thread Paul Griffith
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:33:49 -0500, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I guess I could write rules that verify a valid .tex and .bib document and then assign a minus score, Except trying to run the document through LaTeX, I cannot see how you can realy verify the validity. Let

Re: SpamAssassin and LaTeX

2007-12-06 Thread Paul Griffith
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:36:22 -0500, John D. Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Paul Griffith wrote: I guess I could write rules that verify a valid .tex and .bib document and then assign a minus score, it would be better if e-mail clients actually send attachments as true

Re: SpamAssassin and LaTeX

2007-12-05 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi > I guess I could write rules that verify a valid .tex and .bib document and > then assign a minus score, Except trying to run the document through LaTeX, I cannot see how you can realy verify the validity. > it would be better if e-mail clients actually send attachments as > true attachme

Re: SpamAssassin and LaTeX

2007-12-05 Thread John D. Hardin
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Paul Griffith wrote: > I guess I could write rules that verify a valid .tex and .bib > document and then assign a minus score, it would be better if > e-mail clients actually send attachments as true attachments. Not too hard to do... > \title{\LaTeX} > \date{} > \begin{docum

Re: SpamAssassin and LaTeX

2007-12-05 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 09:59 -0500, Paul Griffith wrote: > Usually the problem happens when a e-mail client places > the text .tex file inline the e-mail/ ^^ > it would be better if e-mail clients actually > send attachments as true attachments. What is a "true" attachm