On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Right. The issue is with installation-time tests, not rules. There's a bug in
> a low-level Perl module that's only exercised at "make test" time.
Actually, I'm fairly certain it's also exercised if you run spamd as root.
Because I am one of the peo
At 07:31 AM 10/23/2004, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> - excessive memory-usage fixes
>
installed on two machines, no problems so far. Memory usage of MailScanner
is slightly higher after upgrade. I assume the memory-usage fixes were for
spamd, anyway?
Kai,
Looking in the Changes a couple of fixes, none see
--On Monday, October 25, 2004 12:56 PM -0400 "Christopher X. Candreva"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. So the DNSBL checks run, just not 'make test'.
Right. The issue is with installation-time tests, not rules. There's a bug
in a low-level Perl module that's only exercised at "make test" tim
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Does this mean if spamd is running as root, it runs the tests as someone
> > other than root, or that it doesn't run the tests at all ?
>
> not at all.
Thanks. So the DNSBL checks run, just not 'make test'.
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher X. Candreva writes:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> > - avoid bug in Sys::Hostname::Long that renames the hostname when "make
> > test" is run
>
> According to changelog:
>
> bug 3806: do not run DNSBL and SPF tes
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
> - avoid bug in Sys::Hostname::Long that renames the hostname when "make
> test" is run
According to changelog:
bug 3806: do not run DNSBL and SPF tests as root on non-linux UNIX
platforms, due to a stupid bug in Sys::Hostname::Long that renam
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote on Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:09:10 -0700:
>
> > - excessive memory-usage fixes
> >
>
> installed on two machines, no problems so far. Memory usage of MailScanner
> is slightly higher after upgrade. I assume the memory-u
Justin Mason wrote on Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:09:10 -0700:
> - excessive memory-usage fixes
>
installed on two machines, no problems so far. Memory usage of MailScanner
is slightly higher after upgrade. I assume the memory-usage fixes were for
spamd, anyway?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany