Re: spamass-milter (sa daemon loads config different to shell ?)

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, David Bürgin wrote: Dipl-Inform. Frank Gadegast: On 27.07.21 14:18, David Bürgin wrote: Dipl-Inform. Frank Gadegast: Seems to be, that spamass-milter simply strippes out any X-Spam* header lines, not caring, if the own call to spamd sets them, hm. Im really not getting,

Re: Spamass milter question

On Wed, 27 May 2020, LuKreme wrote: On May 27, 2020, at 20:08, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2020, @lbutlr wrote: On 27 May 2020, at 18:27, RW wrote: I should have added that if whitelist_from_rcvd *@* server.example.com (without the colon) is only only failing occasionally on mail fr

Re: Spamass milter question

On 27.05.20 10:35, @lbutlr wrote: What, if any, local SpamAssassin settings does spams-milter use when processing incoming mail? don't you mean spamass-milter? For example, if I wanted to white list a sender or blacklist a domain, would the general settings in /usr/local/etc/spamassasin/loca

Re: Spamass milter question

On May 27, 2020, at 20:08, John Hardin wrote: > > On Wed, 27 May 2020, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On 27 May 2020, at 18:27, RW wrote: >>> I should have added that if whitelist_from_rcvd *@* server.example.com >>> (without the colon) is only only failing occasionally on mail from >>> server.example.com

Re: Spamass milter question

On Wed, 27 May 2020, @lbutlr wrote: On 27 May 2020, at 18:27, RW wrote: I should have added that if whitelist_from_rcvd *@* server.example.com (without the colon) is only only failing occasionally on mail from server.example.com, it's probably just an rDNS lookup failure of some sort. Well,

Re: Spamass milter question

On 27 May 2020, at 18:27, RW wrote: > I should have added that if whitelist_from_rcvd *@* server.example.com > (without the colon) is only only failing occasionally on mail from > server.example.com, it's probably just an rDNS lookup failure of some > sort. Well, I do not get anything that I co

Re: Spamass milter question

On Thu, 28 May 2020 01:04:20 +0100 RW wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2020 10:35:26 -0600 > @lbutlr wrote: > > I am wondering because I have a server whitelisted in that file (or > > do I?), but I am seeing occasional logs like: > The lack of recorded rDNS is a common reason for failure. I should have

Re: Spamass milter question

On Wed, 27 May 2020 10:35:26 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > What, if any, local SpamAssassin settings does spams-milter use when > processing incoming mail? > > For example, if I wanted to white list a sender or blacklist a > domain, would the general settings in > /usr/local/etc/spamassasin/local.cf be

Re: Spamass milter question

On 27 May 2020, at 10:44, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 27.05.20 um 18:35 schrieb @lbutlr: >> # Allow all mailing list posts from example.com >> whitelist_from_rcvd: *@* server.example.com Actual file has "whitelist_from_rcvd *@* server.example.com" without the ':'. Was hopeful that was the iss

Re: Spamass milter question

Am 27.05.20 um 18:35 schrieb @lbutlr: What, if any, local SpamAssassin settings does spams-milter use when processing incoming mail? For example, if I wanted to white list a sender or blacklist a domain, would the general settings in /usr/local/etc/spamassasin/local.cf be the place? I am wond

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 27 Jun 2019, at 9:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: for mail received from the net I use amavisd-new with amavisd-milter. Content filter accepts message, I don't want to drop it, send bounce or send it to anyone. I use content filter for mail sent from internal network or through alternative

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 27 Jun 2019, at 9:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > for mail received from the net I use amavisd-new with amavisd-milter. > > Content filter accepts message, I don't want to drop it, send bounce or send > it to anyone. I use content filter for mail sent from internal network or > through alt

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 26 Jun 2019, at 9:02, @lbutlr wrote: Well, I want spam MARKED at 5.0, but I want it REJECTED at 10.0. It is a subtle difference, but the majority of spam being delivered to users is in the 10-100 range. On 26.06.19 22:19, Matt Anton wrote: I achieve that with amavisd-new being configured a

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 26 Jun 2019, at 10:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Could it be what milter macros are sent by the MTA (postfix here) to the >> milter ? > > I don't think so, unless postfix doesn't allow milter to reject e-mail. > rejections with amavis-milter work properly with postfix. It does allow re

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 26 Jun 2019, at 9:02, @lbutlr wrote: > Well, I want spam MARKED at 5.0, but I want it REJECTED at 10.0. It is a > subtle difference, but the majority of spam being delivered to users is in > the 10-100 range. I achieve that with amavisd-new being configured as an after queue content filter,

Re: spamass-milter reject?

I simply overcame this by setting SA’s required_score parameter to a desired value in mail/spamassassin/local.cf On 25 Jun 2019, at 22:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have different value in required_score than I use in -r flag. However that's sendmail installation. There's something stra

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On Jun 25, 2019, at 11:36 AM, Matt Anton wrote: > On 25 Jun 2019, at 2:57, @lbutlr wrote: > >> These are inbound messages being delivered to local users with high spam >> scores. I want Spamassassin-milter to honor the -r 10 flag setting to reject >> messages scoring over 10.0 > > After diggin

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 25 Jun 2019, at 22:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> I simply overcame this by setting SA’s required_score parameter to a desired >> value in mail/spamassassin/local.cf > I have different value in required_score than I use in -r flag. > However that's sendmail installation. There's somethi

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 25 Jun 2019, at 2:57, @lbutlr wrote: These are inbound messages being delivered to local users with high spam scores. I want Spamassassin-milter to honor the -r 10 flag setting to reject messages scoring over 10.0 On 25.06.19 19:36, Matt Anton wrote: After digging on my configuration file

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 25 Jun 2019, at 2:57, @lbutlr wrote: > These are inbound messages being delivered to local users with high spam > scores. I want Spamassassin-milter to honor the -r 10 flag setting to reject > messages scoring over 10.0 After digging on my configuration files I came to the same problem as yo

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 24 Jun 2019, at 14:08, Matt Anton wrote: > On 23 Jun 2019, at 22:39, @lbutlr wrote: > >> I did `postfix relaod` >> >> and the milter is running with the flags shown in the OP. > > Talking about it and your recent thread there, why didn’t you use > spamass-milter’s « -a » parameter which doe

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 23 Jun 2019, at 22:39, @lbutlr wrote: > I did `postfix relaod` > > and the milter is running with the flags shown in the OP. Talking about it and your recent thread there, why didn’t you use spamass-milter’s « -a » parameter which does skip messages received on an authenticated connection?

Re: spamass-milter reject?

OK, the accept was not the issue. Got another email in: Jun 23 14:19:16 mail spamd[9849]: spamd: identified spam (15.7/5.0) for *munge*@covisp.net:58 in 1.5 seconds, 4275 bytes. Jun 23 14:19:16 mail spamd[9849]: spamd: result: Y 15 - BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 23 Jun 2019, at 12:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > is the milter really in action? is it the only milter? It is the only milter and messages are getting tagged as shown in the logs, just the ones scoring over 10 are not getting rejected. Oh, hang on a second, I seem to have left my testi

Re: spamass-milter reject?

On 23.06.19 12:11, @lbutlr wrote: Using Spamassassin-milter via postfix: spamass-milter is running with these settings: /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -f -p /var/run/spamass-milter.sock -u spamd -e -i 65.121.55.40/29 -i 127.0.0.1 -r 10 Reading the man page, -r 10 should be rejecting mail that

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

Am 01.06.2016 um 17:33 schrieb Andy Balholm: > I have gotten a few responses now on the spamass-milter mailing list, but > none of them is from a project member or maintainer. > > I have put a copy of the spamass-milter source at > https://github.com/andybalholm/spamass-milter. Feel free to file

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

I have gotten a few responses now on the spamass-milter mailing list, but none of them is from a project member or maintainer. I have put a copy of the spamass-milter source at https://github.com/andybalholm/spamass-milter. Feel free to file issues or pull requests there. If/when a spamass-milt

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

On 26 May 2016, at 13:53, Andy Balholm wrote: Spamass-milter or spamass-milt (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or Postfix, On 28.05.16 17:34, Bill Cole wrote: I'm not sure that's really true. I

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

On 26 May 2016, at 13:53, Andy Balholm wrote: Spamass-milter or spamass-milt (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or Postfix, I'm not sure that's really true. I've never seen any sort of surveys,

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

On Fri, 27 May 2016, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Another one came onto my mind: abuse@ address separation. - mail to abuse@ should not be rejected as spam, even it it might be scanned (it might be spam report and those should not be rejected) - spams to abuse@ and other addresses should not

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

On Fri, 27 May 2016, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Another one came onto my mind: abuse@ address separation. - mail to abuse@ should not be rejected as spam, even it it might be scanned (it might be spam report and those should not be rejected) - spams to abuse@ and other addresses should not

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates On Thu, 26 May 2016, Andy Balholm wrote: What do you mean? On 26.05.16 13:37, sha...@shanew.net wrote: I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

Yes, I eventually discovered -a in the help text. But it’s not in the man page. I sent a mail to the spamass-milt mailing list (and the maintainers) first, and got no response. It was the first post to that list since September 2014. Andy

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

Am 26.05.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Andy Balholm: I know about the 0.4.0 release in 2014 (almost two years ago). But nothing has happened since then, except the filing of a couple of issues that have not been responded to. The only real issue I have run into is that the -a flag is not documented o

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

I know about the 0.4.0 release in 2014 (almost two years ago). But nothing has happened since then, except the filing of a couple of issues that have not been responded to. The only real issue I have run into is that the -a flag is not documented on the man page. If it looked like the project w

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

Am 26.05.2016 um 23:12 schrieb Andy Balholm: Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22 guess from where the Fedora main

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22. Andy

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

Am 26.05.2016 um 20:37 schrieb sha...@shanew.net: I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get added when they pass through spamass-milter. The current behavior is that four(?) SA headers are kept, but ever

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get added when they pass through spamass-milter. The current behavior is that four(?) SA headers are kept, but everything else is discarded. I've wanted something like

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

> ...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates What do you mean? Andy

Re: spamass-milter: orphaned?

On 26.05.16 10:53, Andy Balholm wrote: Spamass-milter or spamass-milt (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or Postfix, but it is woefully under-maintained. (The security problem mentioned on https://

Re: spamass-milter and virtual config dir

Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 17.10.15 15:22, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >>OPTIONS="-u spamass-milter -i 127.0.0.1 -m -I -- >>--socket /var/spool/postfix/spamassassin/spamd.sock" > >>I don't know how to do that, though! It seems like milter macros should >>be involved. In /etc/postfix/main.cf I

Re: spamass-milter and virtual config dir

On 17.10.15 15:22, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: OPTIONS="-u spamass-milter -i 127.0.0.1 -m -I -- --socket /var/spool/postfix/spamassassin/spamd.sock" I don't know how to do that, though! It seems like milter macros should be involved. In /etc/postfix/main.cf I've got: milter_connect_macros = j {dae

Re: spamass-milter and email addresses starting with --

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:21:38 +0200 Michael Grant wrote: > I'm running Debian, sendmail, spamass-milter, spamc and spamd. > > I saw this in my log: > > Jun 9 20:30:29 debian sm-mta[15942]: t5A0ULAA015942: > to=<--u...@example.com > > > > then I saw this: > > Jun 9 20:30:29 strange spamc[15947

Re: spamass-milter and email addresses starting with --

On 6/10/2015 4:42 PM, Michael Grant wrote: I'm using 0.3.2 which seems to be the latest version available for Debian. It does appear that 0.4.0 hasn't hit Debian yet. If I am reading the code correctly, the only change in 0.3.2 to 0.4.0 in the relevant section is to use strdup, i.e.

Re: spamass-milter and email addresses starting with --

On 6/10/2015 4:34 PM, David B Funk wrote: What version of spamass-milter are you using? Older versions of spamass-milter used a "system" call to invoke "spamc" and feed it messages, thus had a glaring security vulnerability. That was fixed a while ago, you need to update your spamass-milter.

Re: spamass-milter and email addresses starting with --

I'm using 0.3.2 which seems to be the latest version available for Debian. It does appear that 0.4.0 hasn't hit Debian yet. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:34 PM, David B Funk wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Michael Grant wrote: > > I'm running Debian, sendmail, spamass-milter, spamc and spamd. >> >>

Re: spamass-milter and email addresses starting with --

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Michael Grant wrote: I'm running Debian, sendmail, spamass-milter, spamc and spamd. I saw this in my log: Jun  9 20:30:29 debian sm-mta[15942]: t5A0ULAA015942: to=<--u...@example.com> then I saw this: Jun  9 20:30:29 strange spamc[15947]: invalid usage Jun  9 20:30:29 stra

Re: spamass-milter processing brunette.com messages as if from localhost

On 23.04.15 06:23, kremels wrote: Received: from ms045.bronto.com (unknown) by mail.covisp.net(Postfix 2.11.4/8.13.0) with SMTP id unknown; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:00:38 -0600 (envelope-from ) Received: from localhost (10.0.1.163) by ms045.bronto.com id h6gbnc1usqsi for ; Sun, 19

Re: spamass-milter processing brunette.com messages as if from localhost

On 2015-04-22 03:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: nOn 20.04.15 09:08, @lbutlr wrote: Bronto.com is a remailer service for various companies (like Fractureme.com and others) and I’ve been noting that it hits some odd triggers in spamass-milter: Apr 19 15:00:40 mail spamd[87225]: spamd: result:

Re: spamass-milter processing brunette.com messages as if from localhost

nOn 20.04.15 09:08, @lbutlr wrote: Bronto.com is a remailer service for various companies (like Fractureme.com and others) and I’ve been noting that it hits some odd triggers in spamass-milter: Apr 19 15:00:40 mail spamd[87225]: spamd: result: Y 5 - BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FSL_HELO_NON_F

Re: spamass-milter and multiple local domains

On 16 Feb 2015, at 02:38 , Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 16.02.2015 um 10:32 schrieb LuKreme: >> I have several local domains that resolve (via virtual) to local users in >> addition to virtual domains that resolve to sql users. >> with spamass-milter, these secondary local domains (like kreme.com) f

Re: spamass-milter and multiple local domains

On 02/16/2015 10:32 AM, LuKreme wrote: I have several local domains that resolve (via virtual) to local users in addition to virtual domains that resolve to sql users. with spamass-milter, these secondary local domains (like kreme.com) fail to find the user: spamd: handle_user (userdir) unable

Re: spamass-milter and multiple local domains

Am 16.02.2015 um 10:32 schrieb LuKreme: I have several local domains that resolve (via virtual) to local users in addition to virtual domains that resolve to sql users. with spamass-milter, these secondary local domains (like kreme.com) fail to find the user: spamd: handle_user (userdir) unabl

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Am 23.03.2013 22:46, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: >>> Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-03-20 15:44: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html > >> Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen: >>> are spamass-milter using spamc ? > > On 23.03.13 00:34, Robert Schetterer wrot

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > spamass-milter also supports "--socket", so it is not limited to only spamc. And... that is wrong. Anything passed to spamass-milter after "--" (i.e. --socket=...) is passed on to spamc. -Jim P.

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Dave Funk wrote: > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>> Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen: are spamass-milter using spamc ? >> >> >> On 23.03.13 00:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> >>> at my knowledge >>> spamass-milter uses

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen: are spamass-milter using spamc ? On 23.03.13 00:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: at my knowledge spamass-milter uses spamd, the deamon vers of spamc no, no, spamd is the daemon and spamc is an utili

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-03-20 15:44: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen: are spamass-milter using spamc ? On 23.03.13 00:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: at my knowledge spamass-milter uses spamd, the deamon vers of spa

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen: > Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-03-20 15:44: > >> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html > > are spamass-milter using spamc ? at my knowledge spamass-milter uses spamd, the deamon vers of spamc i.e mail log spamc[26134]: skipped

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-03-20 15:44: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html are spamass-milter using spamc ?

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Am 20.03.2013 22:27, schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: > On 3/20/2013 12:58 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: >> Am 20.03.2013 15:44, schrieb Robert Schetterer: >>> guess you have a failure in your setup, ask spamassassin list >> uff ,my fault i saw this comming from postfix list >> >> >> Best Regards >> MfG Ro

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On 3/20/2013 12:58 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 20.03.2013 15:44, schrieb Robert Schetterer: guess you have a failure in your setup, ask spamassassin list uff ,my fault i saw this comming from postfix list Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Have you considered mimedefang instead of spamas

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Am 20.03.2013 15:44, schrieb Robert Schetterer: > guess you have a failure in your setup, ask spamassassin list uff ,my fault i saw this comming from postfix list Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On 20/03/2013 14:24, Axb wrote: On 03/20/2013 02:59 PM, Giles Coochey wrote: Hi, I'm using spamass-milter in conjunction with spamassassin. I've noticed that emails that are considered too large for spamassassin to scan appear to be rejected by spamass-milter because it cannot find a score in

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On 20.03.13 13:59, Giles Coochey wrote: I'm using spamass-milter in conjunction with spamassassin. I've noticed that emails that are considered too large for spamassassin to scan appear to be rejected by spamass-milter because it cannot find a score in the email. I use those two too, but I h

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

Am 20.03.2013 14:59, schrieb Giles Coochey: > Hi, > > I'm using spamass-milter in conjunction with spamassassin. > > I've noticed that emails that are considered too large for spamassassin > to scan appear to be rejected by spamass-milter because it cannot find a > score in the email. > > I've l

Re: spamass-milter rejecting messages because no score found in large emails

On 03/20/2013 02:59 PM, Giles Coochey wrote: Hi, I'm using spamass-milter in conjunction with spamassassin. I've noticed that emails that are considered too large for spamassassin to scan appear to be rejected by spamass-milter because it cannot find a score in the email. I've looked at the co

Re: spamass-milter - mailing list

On 25/01/2011 20:33, Joe Sniderman wrote: On 01/25/2011 02:29 PM, JKL wrote: Hi there, Is there a mailing list specifically for problems arising from spamass-milter? There is a spamass-milter mailing list, yes: http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list I've found it to b

Re: spamass-milter - mailing list

On 01/25/2011 08:33 PM, Joe Sniderman wrote: > On 01/25/2011 02:29 PM, JKL wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Is there a mailing list specifically for problems arising from >> spamass-milter? > There is a spamass-milter mailing list, yes: > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list > >

Re: spamass-milter - mailing list

On 01/25/2011 02:29 PM, JKL wrote: > Hi there, > > Is there a mailing list specifically for problems arising from > spamass-milter? There is a spamass-milter mailing list, yes: http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list HTH -- Joe Sniderman

Re: spamass-milter -r doesn't work for me

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Andreas Haumer wrote: Hi! Am 08.02.2010 21:47, schrieb Shane Williams: I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit. In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a specified e

Re: spamass-milter -r doesn't work for me

Hi! Am 08.02.2010 21:47, schrieb Shane Williams: > I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and > reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit. > > In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a > specified email address (in case you want to in

Re: spamass-milter -r doesn't work for me

I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit. In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a specified email address (in case you want to inspect it). Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I thin

Re: spamass-milter -r doesn't work for me

Hi Christoph! Am 08.02.2010 15:50, schrieb Christoph Lehmann: > I've problems telling spamass-milter to reject mails. > > spamass-milter - Version 0.3.1 > > I start it by: > > /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -b > spam...@ourdomain.com -u smmsp -f -r 15 -- -d spamscanner

Re: spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

For sake of completeness I would like to send out the solution to this, in case anyone else is also having the same porblem. It seems like there is a problem with forking on FreeBSD 6.3: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119920 The solution to fix this problem is to edit the fil

Re: spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

Here is anothe occurance of this problem: Mar 2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85764]: m22JeJxE085764: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=1678, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57] Mar 2 14:40:22 sara

Re: spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

On 29/02/2008 12:51 PM, Aflatoon Aflatooni wrote: > Hi, > I have installed spamassassin on my freebsd 6.3 and everything works > great but after some time (it could be couple of days, or hours) the CPU > utilization on spamass-milter goes to almost 100%. > I have discovered that the following messa

Re: Spamass-Milter Help

Perhaps you're looking for the -i option, especially in the form of "-i 127.0.0.1"? Or am I not understanding your situation? On Mon, 7 May 2007, dougp23 wrote: I am trying to get all my spam forwarded to one box on my system. Seems easy enough. (Sendmail is my MTA) Anyways, my optional fla

Re: SpamAss-Milter

From: "Christopher Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi people, Have any of you used the SpamAss-Milter? I am still having hell getting all our inbound mail into spamassassin. Mail going to local mailboxes gets scanned, but if they

Re: spamass milter + clamav milter + milter greylist != working

Thanks, I think I got it - i noticed you didn't have the clamav line define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `clmilter') so i took it out and clamav-milter seems to be working fine w/ out it. re: headers - milter-greylist writes a new header line "Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.

Re: spamass-milter vs user_prefs

At 04:30 PM 12/21/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get spamass-milter with user_prefs to work, the only solution what i found yet is to use a global user_prefs with the spamd virtual-config-dir option. Is there a configuration possible which allows individual user_prefs with spamass-mil

Re: Spamass-milter 0.2.0 and spamassassin 3.0

Thanks. So 0.2.1 should have the fix? > It works with one slight problem fixed in CVS already. > If set, the reject threshold (-r ) in 0.2.0 looks for "hits" instead of > "score". > > If you set to -1 (reject anything tagged as spam), 0.2.0 works fine. > > > -Original Message- > From:

RE: Spamass-milter 0.2.0 and spamassassin 3.0

It works with one slight problem fixed in CVS already. If set, the reject threshold (-r ) in 0.2.0 looks for "hits" instead of "score". If you set to -1 (reject anything tagged as spam), 0.2.0 works fine. -Original Message- From: Randall Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, Oc