ram wrote:
So would you suggest I remove all shortcircuit on DNS Rules.
Is there anyway I can get USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST evaluated before All
other tests
No.. It's a DNS based test, so it would be counterproductive to try to
make one run before the others. For the cases where
USER_IN_SPF_W
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 19:48 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> ram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In my local.cf I have
> >
> > --
> > score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100
> >
> > priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000
> > priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800
> >
> >
> > shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on
> > sh
On Jun 26, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote:
Benny, you might want to read the docs:
docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not
working
so here
Hmmm then you are running a faulty or modified version I guess,
On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote:
> Benny, you might want to read the docs:
docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not working
so here
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
ram wrote:
Hi
In my local.cf I have
--
score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100
priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800
shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on
shortcircuit RCVD_IN_XBL spam
--
So I expect RCVD_IN_XBL to be evaluated after USER_IN_SPF_WHI
On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Larry Nedry wrote:
On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start
with, and
10 would be tested before 0 :-)
And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 20
On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
>make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and
>10 would be tested before 0 :-)
And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
>On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote:
>> Negative numbers co
On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote:
> That is not correct.
so then sagrey is brokken
> Negative numbers come before positive numbers.
nope
order is positive to negative
you might find it is correct by testing more :)
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage
On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote:
How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited
rules
of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive
ones
make priority positive not negative, default all h
On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote:
> How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited rules
> of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive
> ones
make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and
10 would be tested before
10 matches
Mail list logo
