Matt Kettler wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:52:09PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
When I look at the message source, the following is among them--this
is actually from YOUR reply.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-Spam-Score: -65
X-Spam-Bar: --
Looks like it
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:52:09PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
When I look at the message source, the following is among them--this is
actually from YOUR reply.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-Spam-Score: -65
X-Spam-Bar: --
In a standard config, X-Spam-Stat
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:52:09PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> When I look at the message source, the following is among them--this is
> actually from YOUR reply.
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
> X-Spam-Score: -65
> X-Spam-Bar: --
In a standard config, X-Spam-Status has a lot more infor
When I look at the message source, the following is among them--this is
actually from YOUR reply.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-Spam-Score: -65
X-Spam-Bar: --
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:22:00PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
When looking at the headers that SA p
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:22:00PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> When looking at the headers that SA puts in my messages, what's the diff
> between BARS and SCORE?
It depends, what are you talking about? :)
Do you have X-Spam-BARS and X-Spam-SCORE as headers? If so, you need to
figure out what t