> >On 26.07.07 14:11, Stefan Klewer wrote:
> >>Rsync all RBLs, which are listed in the spamassassin config and integrate
> >>them into a local rbldnsd. it really helps fasten up scanning
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 at 15:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> >I'm afraid that rsyncing of spamhaus a
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 at 15:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Per Jessen schrieb:
It could be caused by DNS lookups taking longer. That would be my guess
for anything taking more than 5 seconds.
On 26.07.07 14:11, Stefan Klewer wrote:
Rsync all RBLs, which are listed in the spamassass
> Per Jessen schrieb:
> > It could be caused by DNS lookups taking longer. That would be my guess
> > for anything taking more than 5 seconds.
On 26.07.07 14:11, Stefan Klewer wrote:
> Rsync all RBLs, which are listed in the spamassassin config and integrate
> them into a local rbldnsd. it really
Betreff: Re: Scantime on messages
Per Jessen schrieb:
> It could be caused by DNS lookups taking longer. That would be my guess
> for anything taking more than 5 seconds.
Per Jessen schrieb:
It could be caused by DNS lookups taking longer. That would be my guess
for anything taking more than 5 seconds.
try to use a local dns cache ... helps here to fasten up mail scanning!
\jd
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm looking over my logs and it *seems* to me that its taking
> exceessivley long for these messages to scan, granted I don't have the
> latest and greatest hardware, but I rarely if ever use swap - so I
> don't *think* that it should take so long-
>
I
