On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:18 -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
> That is exactly what I do. I have two clamav instances using seperate
> config files, library directories, listening on different sockets.
> The first runs just the official ClamAV supplied sigs, the second all the
> various 3rd party sigs (San
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, Steffen Heil (Mailinglisten) wrote:
Take INetMsg-SpamDomains-2m.ndb and jurlbla.ndb IF they both
contain the same host name... then the INetMsg-SpamDomains-2m.ndb
signature name WILL ALWAYS be given out ...because the database is
loaded by the clamav engine first.. tha
> header L_AV_Unofficial X-Amavis-AV-Status =~
> m{\bAV:Sanesecurity.TestSig_Type4_Hdr.2.UNOFFICIAL\b}
> Which seems to be scoring 4 just fine:
> X-Spam-Status: ... tests=[.. L_AV_Unofficial=4
Indeed.
> The weird part is this:
>
> X-Spam-Status: ...
> tests=[AV:Sanesecurity.TestSig_Type4_Hdr
On 05/08, Munroe Sollog wrote:
> I am working on adding some rules to SA so that SA adds more points when
> detecting a signature. Here is a pastebin of the headers and the rules:
>
> http://pastebin.com/qnwbSq5d
>
> It should be adding 4 points as per my rule, but as it is it is only
> adding 0
John Rudd wrote the following on 6/27/2007 10:27 AM -0800:
> Bret Miller wrote:
>>> Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
>>> definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful in the
>>> Spam Wars?
>>
>> You're in luck! I just installed them yesterday. Had bee
I'm using it and I really like it. Very effective.
Craig Carriere schrieb:
Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful in the Spam
Wars?
Thanks
very effective"
M. Häker
> Bret Miller wrote:
> >> Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
> >> definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful
> >> in the Spam Wars?
> >
> > You're in luck! I just installed them yesterday. Had been
> meaning to for
> > a while, but things have been t
> -Original Message-
> From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 1:27 PM
> To: Bret Miller
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SaneSecurity
>
> Bret Miller wrote:
> >> Perhaps more a clamav
Bret Miller wrote:
Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful
in the Spam Wars?
You're in luck! I just installed them yesterday. Had been meaning to for
a while, but things have been too busy to get the script
> Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
> definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful
> in the Spam Wars?
You're in luck! I just installed them yesterday. Had been meaning to for
a while, but things have been too busy to get the script written to
update
11 matches
Mail list logo
