RE: Salesforce web bug

2006-12-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:46 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Salesforce web bug > > > > Why do you want to consider this a spam sign? I'm just cur

Re: Salesforce web bug

2006-12-20 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 12/20/06, Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do you want to consider this a spam sign? I'm just curious. Bugs in mail messages are generally a suspicious circumstance, and probably good for a fractional point all by themselves. In general any tracking that will auto-identify with

Re: Salesforce web bug

2006-12-20 Thread Loren Wilton
Why do you want to consider this a spam sign? I'm just curious. Bugs in mail messages are generally a suspicious circumstance, and probably good for a fractional point all by themselves. In general any tracking that will auto-identify without the user at least clicking on something is suspi

Re: Salesforce web bug

2006-12-20 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 12/19/06, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed an email from salesforce has a 'user tracking' web bug in it but it isn't currently detected by SA or SARES Why do you want to consider this a spam sign? I'm just curious.