On Saturday, September 11, 2004, 6:32:57 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> There are RBL time-outs for
> local.cf, but they don't apply to URIDNSBL since this is a separate
> module.
Here's a timeout mentioned in URIDNSBL.pm:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/
Jeff Chan wrote on Sat, 11 Sep 2004 03:16:32 -0700:
> I would expect DNS timeouts are imposed by the application or
> operating system. I don't think anyone would allow these
> programs to run indefinitely due to the lack of a timeout
> value.
>
Jeff, you already answered my question with a simi
On Saturday, September 11, 2004, 2:51:38 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> But, there's still my concern about SURBL timeouts. It seems there's no
> way to specify SURBL timeouts. Is this true? If so, this is an absolute
> must to add in the URIDNSBL module. DNS timeouts for the other RBL lookups
> are a
Jeff Chan wrote on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:25:48 -0700:
> I assume all programs are subject to some kind of DNS lookup
> timeouts either in the application or an external resolver.
> RBL lookups in general should be quite fast and cached. If
> something is taking longer than 120 seconds it's probably
On Monday, September 6, 2004, 5:57:32 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:56:57 -0700:
>> Hang on, that's not a meaningful test since it would be in your
>> local resolver cache.
>>
> First check took 22 msec to get the data from our forwarder. I noticed
> that our ns
Jeff Chan wrote on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:56:57 -0700:
> Hang on, that's not a meaningful test since it would be in your
> local resolver cache.
>
First check took 22 msec to get the data from our forwarder. I noticed
that our nscd isn't running, so I restarted it, although I don't think
there shou
Jeff Chan wrote on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:37:35 -0700:
> What you describe sounds perhaps like a DNS timeout (which
> SA3 may support through your operating system's resolver).
> There are currently three SURBL nameservers with problems,
> but they're all commented out of the authority for the
> subdo
On Monday, September 6, 2004, 4:37:35 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> If you do:
> dig test.surbl.org.multi.surbl.org a
> many times, do you get any delays?
Hang on, that's not a meaningful test since it would be in your
local resolver cache.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.s
On Monday, September 6, 2004, 4:41:51 PM, David Coulson wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> What you describe sounds perhaps like a DNS timeout (which
>> SA3 may support through your operating system's resolver).
>> There are currently three SURBL nameservers with problems,
>> but they're all commented ou
On Monday, September 6, 2004, 4:20:56 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I haven't debugged this yet any further since I'm on the brink to leaving
> for a vacation. Is it possible that one or more of the SURBL RBLs habe
> problems today? I was getting a lot of SA time-outs today and the first
> reason wh
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Tue, 07 Sep 2004 01:20:56 +0200:
> Subject: SURBL problems
>
This is missing a question mark, of course.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
