On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
> Loren Wilton writes:
> >
> > I *think* they may have implemented counting rules fairly recently; but I'm
> > not sure if that patch was ever released.
>
> yep, "tflags multiple" support, in 3.2.0.
Woohoo!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http
Loren Wilton writes:
> You can't do what you want in 2.6x, at least without writing an eval rule in
> perl.
>
> I *think* they may have implemented counting rules fairly recently; but I'm
> not sure if that patch was ever released.
yep, "tflags multiple" support, in 3.2.0.
--j.
John W Mickevich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and I hope I am asking this
> question via the appropriate channel. If not, please let me know.
> I have been receiving spam email that is not getting caught by
> SpamAssassin and want to add a rule to catch it. These part
Time for you to start using uribls.
For SA 2.64 you'll need spamcopuri ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/ ),
and then check www.surbl.org for usage
instructions.
Better to upgrade to SA 3.1.5.
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi returns
this for thelevelgroup.net:
You can't
do what you want in 2.6x, at least without writing an eval rule in
perl.
I *think*
they may have implemented counting rules fairly recently; but I'm not sure if
that patch was ever released.
In any
case, you should be able to use network tests and SURBL in 2.64 and that will i
slyandjen wrote:
> If SpamAssasin is enable
>
> does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner?
>
MailScanner will still use it's own white/black lists even when
SpamAssassin is enabled.
It should also be noted that white/black lists, as well as any "spam
lists" you enable in Ma
slyandjen wrote:
> If SpamAssasin is enable
>
> does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner?
>
> if it does
>
> where is the whitelist/Blacklist settings
That's a MailScanner specific question, so you should really try posting
about it on the MailScanner lists
--
Mr Mich
Slyandjen wrote on Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:21:20 -0700 (PDT):
> I fixed the problem today but all I want to know is where is the email
> stored if they are not send to the user
In the quarantine.
-> wiki.mailscanner.info
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Servi
From: "slyandjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FromOrTo: name at isp.comyes
FromOrTo: name2 at isp2.com yes
FromOrTo: default no
these are just demos
they are usually filled with normal addresses
I fixed the problem today but all I want to know is where is the email
stored if t
FromOrTo: name at isp.comyes
FromOrTo: name2 at isp2.com yes
FromOrTo: default no
these are just demos
they are usually filled with normal addresses
I fixed the problem today but all I want to know is where is the email
stored if they are not send to the user
--
View
Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, slyandjen wrote:
>> what is the correct procedure to enable to spam.blacklist file
>> I edited a file /etc/ and changed a line
>> Is Definitely Spam = %rules-dir%/spam.blacklist.rules
>> High Scoring Spam Actions = store
>> and then I created a spam.blacklis
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, slyandjen wrote:
what is the correct procedure to enable to spam.blacklist file
I edited a file /etc/ and changed a line
Is Definitely Spam = %rules-dir%/spam.blacklist.rules
High Scoring Spam Actions = store
and then I created a spam.blacklist file and edited it
FromOrTo:
12 matches
Mail list logo
