>> On ons 15 dec 2010 19:20:28 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
>>> I did play more with gmail as example, and notice. If I send email
>>> from web interface SPF always matched and OK. If I'm using MUA to send
>>> mail via SMTP it never fail or pass SPF rule. Probably new "Received:"
>>> header is related
On 15.12.10 20:08, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> my mx have public ip and not behind nat, should i add public ip of my mx into
> internal_networks?
Your internal_networks should contain IP addresses of all MX servers, and
also all servers your mail server passes before it is checked by
spamassassin, th
On 16/12/10 01:04, Benny Pedersen wrote:
so more then one header is needed in your case ?
Well SA only see first header, second header added after mail
re-inserted into queue after SA check.
What I don't understand is why it was working for some hosts before,
because there always at least one
On ons 15 dec 2010 22:58:29 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
Problem was in "spf: relayed through one or more trusted relays,
cannot use header-based Envelope-From"
always_trust_envelope_sender 1 is helps in my case, both of my
trusted relays are 127.0.0.1.
so more then one header is needed in you
Problem was in "spf: relayed through one or more trusted relays, cannot
use header-based Envelope-From"
always_trust_envelope_sender 1 is helps in my case, both of my trusted
relays are 127.0.0.1.
On 15.12.10 22:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 15 dec 2010 20:05:46 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
B
On ons 15 dec 2010 20:05:46 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
Both using smtp when delivering mail to my server, difference is
only in headers.
no logs ?
have you configured envelope sender in spamassassin ?
or better yet readed
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::S
On ons 15 dec 2010 19:34:12 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
I probably mean "sent" word, I don't use sendmail. My MUA is Thunderbird.
thunderbird use smtp, web apps does not use smtp ?
that would explain why its working or not
logs please
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On 15.12.2010 21:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 15 dec 2010 19:20:28 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
I did play more with gmail as example, and notice. If I send email
from web interface SPF always matched and OK. If I'm using MUA to send
mail via SMTP it never fail or pass SPF rule. Probably new "R
On ons 15 dec 2010 19:20:28 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
I did play more with gmail as example, and notice. If I send email
from web interface SPF always matched and OK. If I'm using MUA to
send mail via SMTP it never fail or pass SPF rule. Probably new
"Received:" header is related, any ideas?
On 15.12.2010 20:33, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 15 dec 2010 18:08:20 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
my mx have public ip and not behind nat, should i add public ip of my
mx into internal_networks?
no, just trusted (you trust your own server, and forwarding ips)
internal is more if you use serve
On ons 15 dec 2010 18:08:20 CET, Nikolay Shopik wrote
my mx have public ip and not behind nat, should i add public ip of
my mx into internal_networks?
no, just trusted (you trust your own server, and forwarding ips)
internal is more if you use servers in rfc1918 ip ranges
other then that ch
my mx have public ip and not behind nat, should i add public ip of my mx into
internal_networks?
"Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
>>> On 15.12.10 10:59, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
I have domain hosted at google apps, and my domain have recomended
>by
google txt record "v=spf1 include:_spf.g
>> On 15.12.10 10:59, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>>> I have domain hosted at google apps, and my domain have recomended by
>>> google txt record "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all". So far when I
>>> receive mail from this domain spamassassin doesn't trigger rule SPF_PASS
>>> nor SPF_SOFTFAIL, is this
On 15/12/10 12:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 15.12.10 10:59, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
I have domain hosted at google apps, and my domain have recomended by
google txt record "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all". So far when I
receive mail from this domain spamassassin doesn't trigger rule S
On 15.12.10 10:59, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> I have domain hosted at google apps, and my domain have recomended by
> google txt record "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all". So far when I
> receive mail from this domain spamassassin doesn't trigger rule SPF_PASS
> nor SPF_SOFTFAIL, is this norm
15 matches
Mail list logo
