On 9/9/06, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:Bug 5077 includes a one line patch to fix this. It'll be included in3.1.6 but is trivial to apply by hand now.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5077I seem to have multiple versions of SPF.pm on m
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
>>
>> (yes, I looked up the ip address and pulled a txt record from aol, and
>> yes, the ips are in the range, and yes, I have gotten SPF_SOFTFAIL from
>> domains without any spf records)
>
> Bug 5077 includes a one line patch to fix this. It'll be included in
> 3.1.6 b
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:11 PM
To: Michel Vaillancourt
Cc: Spamassassin List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: SPF Scores
Why, or to what end, would you want to adjust the scores?
Because if
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:11 PM
> To: Michel Vaillancourt
> Cc: Spamassassin List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: SPF Scores
>
>
> Why, or to what end, would you want to adjust the scores?
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> I set up SPF for Wolfstar.ca yesterday, and I've been reading a bit off
> the website about SPF itself. WRT to SA, I'm interested in knowing if folks
> have adjusted their "stock" SPF scores or if they've done some custom rules
> to lever this technology?
>
