Re: SOUGHT ruleset FP

2010-04-16 Thread Matthew Newton
Hi, On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:53:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote: > > We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also > > hit a few other rules that pushed it over our reject threshold of > > 10, and easily over th

Re: SOUGHT ruleset FP

2010-04-16 Thread Justin Mason
yep -- feel free to send me over copies of FP messages (or strings that match them) 2010/4/16 Karsten Bräckelmann : > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote: >> We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also >> hit a few other rules that pushed it over our rejec

Re: SOUGHT ruleset FP

2010-04-16 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote: > We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also > hit a few other rules that pushed it over our reject threshold of > 10, and easily over the 'junk mail folder' level of 5. > > I managed to get them to send me the message