Re: SASL and SPF Fail

2007-06-13 Thread Luis Hernán Otegui
OK, got the picture. Guess I'll go for the upgrade of postfix. Thanks again, Luis 2007/6/13, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: > OK, Daryl, got the point. Made a rule to match my Postfix-2.2 auth > headers. Now, a question: how do I assign a score of zero to SPF

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

2007-06-13 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: OK, Daryl, got the point. Made a rule to match my Postfix-2.2 auth headers. Now, a question: how do I assign a score of zero to SPF_FAIL (in order to disable that rule) if my custom rule matches? I guess it's via a META rule, but I can't get it working... Based on the r

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

2007-06-13 Thread Luis Hernán Otegui
OK, Daryl, got the point. Made a rule to match my Postfix-2.2 auth headers. Now, a question: how do I assign a score of zero to SPF_FAIL (in order to disable that rule) if my custom rule matches? I guess it's via a META rule, but I can't get it working... Based on the rule published at SA's Wiki,

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

2007-06-13 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: Hi, list, several of my users are beggining to use the SASL method to send mails trhough the server. The point is that the messages from one of these users are getting tagged as spam (the lil' bastard uses Incredimail, so a bunch of another stuff regardind this crappy pi