On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:43:16 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 14.01.11 23:19, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> meta SPF_NICE_PASS (SPF_HELO_PASS && SPF_PASS)
>
> I don't see any benefit of this rule, do you?
it only hits ham here, never spam, so wanted to know if that same in
public corpus, in
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:04:49 -1000, "Warren Togami Jr."
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put
>
> > them into the nightly masscheck for testing.
On 14.01.11 23:19, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> meta SPF_NICE_PASS (SPF_HELO_PASS && SPF_PASS)
I don't
On 01/15/2011 01:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
In a year of running them locally I've never seen them hit on a ham
message. They appear to hit quite well for me because I pre-filter 95%+
of my spam at the smtp level (greylisting, HELO checks, spamhaus etc) so
SA only gets to see the difficult to catc
On 15/01/11 01:54, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Ned Slider wrote:
header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received =~ /helo[= ]user\)/i
describe NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received from HELO User
Might want to combine into a meta rule with existing
NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER rule:
header NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER Rece
On 15/01/11 00:19, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 01/14/2011 01:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 14/01/11 21:04, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put
them into the nightly masscheck for testing.
Warren
header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Ned Slider wrote:
header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received =~ /helo[= ]user\)/i
describeNSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received from HELO User
Might want to combine into a meta rule with existing NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER rule:
header NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put them
into the nightly masscheck for testing.
I need to put in my postcard rules...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.o
On 01/14/2011 01:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 14/01/11 21:04, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put
them into the nightly masscheck for testing.
Warren
header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received =~ /helo[= ]user\)/i
describe NSL_RCVD_HELO_U
On 14/01/11 21:04, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put
them into the nightly masscheck for testing.
Warren
header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received =~ /helo[= ]user\)/i
describeNSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Recei
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:04:49 -1000, "Warren Togami Jr."
wrote:
> Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put
> them into the nightly masscheck for testing.
meta SPF_NICE_PASS (SPF_HELO_PASS && SPF_PASS)
On 1/14/2011 2:28 AM, James Lay wrote:
Hey All!
Been a while since I did a full blown install of SpamAssassin, and as
I'm looking at my old setup, I see a fair amount of changes. I have the
SARE rules as well as RulesDuJour running, but noticed that on a fresh
install of SA, after doing an sa-up
On 1/14/11 6:38 AM, "Jason Bertoch" wrote:
>On 2011/01/14 7:28 AM, James Lay wrote:
>> Hey All!
>>
>> Been a while since I did a full blown install of SpamAssassin, and as
>> I'm looking at my old setup, I see a fair amount of changes. I have the
>> SARE rules as well as RulesDuJour running, but
> On 01/14/2011 01:28 PM, James Lay wrote:
>> Been a while since I did a full blown install of SpamAssassin, and as
>> I'm looking at my old setup, I see a fair amount of changes. I have
>> the SARE rules as well as RulesDuJour running, but noticed that on a
>> fresh install of SA, after doing an
On 2011/01/14 7:28 AM, James Lay wrote:
Hey All!
Been a while since I did a full blown install of SpamAssassin, and as
I'm looking at my old setup, I see a fair amount of changes. I have the
SARE rules as well as RulesDuJour running, but noticed that on a fresh
install of SA, after doing an sa-u
This is getting asked about every week :-) Short answer: no, not relevant
anymore, don't use.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On 01/14/2011 01:28 PM, James Lay wrote:
Hey All!
Been a while since I did a full blown install of SpamAssassin, and as
I'm looking at my old setup, I see a fair amount of changes. I have
the SARE rules as well as RulesDuJour running, but noticed that on a
fresh install of SA, after doing an sa
16 matches
Mail list logo
