Re: SA does not check messages which have already be marked in the header

2005-04-02 Thread Loren Wilton
> But anyway, if one has good ideas how to integrate a result from a previous test into a local test, I will be happy to hear about it. In 3.0+ you can use full to find previous SA headers in the mail, and then write rules against their presence. In some rare cases this could be useful I suppose.

Re: SA does not check messages which have already be marked in the header

2005-04-02 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:34 AM 4/2/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Obviously my SA skips messages wich are already marked. Can I switch this "skip" off? SA itself doesn't "skip" messages that are already marked. Period. You'll have to look at the configuration you're using to call SA, as the only way to "skip" messag

Re: SA does not check messages which have already be marked in the header

2005-04-02 Thread Loren Wilton
Is it possible you have procmail set up to check for X-Spam-Status: Yes in the incoming mail and bypass SA? Some people do this sort of thing. (But you don't want to bypass on a status of No, of course.) Loren

Re: SA does not check messages which have already be marked in the header

2005-04-02 Thread Loren Wilton
> Obviously my SA skips messages wich are already marked. What makes you think this? So far as I know, SA strips (most) previous SA headers from the mail, then processes it. So you may or may not get the same results the second time. Loren