Re: SA Skipped Message

2010-03-05 Thread Carlos Mennens
2010/3/5 Karsten Bräckelmann : > Nope, don't change it. It's a default for a reason. :) > > Setting this limit higher usually will not even catch more spam, since > almost no spam exceeds that size. Typically, they are *much* smaller. > However, ham with large attachments would then also be process

Re: SA Skipped Message

2010-03-05 Thread Bowie Bailey
Carlos Mennens wrote: > I noticed someone sent me an email and there are no SA heading info in > the message. SA didn't provide a score or status on the message > headers for some weird reason. I then checked my mail logs and saw > this message: > > Mar 5 08:52:18 mail spamc[2635]: skipped message

Re: SA Skipped Message

2010-03-05 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:42 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote: > I noticed someone sent me an email and there are no SA heading info in > the message. SA didn't provide a score or status on the message > headers for some weird reason. I then checked my mail logs and saw > this message: > > Mar 5 08:52: