[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The production server we are trying to run on only has 128mb of memory.
I can't believe we got a machine with that little, but it happened. I
might try running only 2 children of SPAMD, refreshing the processes
every 5 messages or so to see if that will work, but I'd s
sages or so to see if that
will work, but I'd say the machine is a little light on the horsepower.
Thanks again!
Alex S Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/12/2005 12:04 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject
Re: SA Performance under Solaris -w-
Sendmai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance
problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8
and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
Ran the test differently and got different results. I sent the 573
messages from a different host. Both the send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance
problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8
and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
This may not be much help. I put 573 messages in a subfolder and ran
the following script. I watched `prstat -n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance
problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8
and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
What is the simplest way for me to see this problem? I use CSW packages
for sendmail, MD, SA, perl and others. R
