Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Kelson
Kris Deugau wrote: You mean, "like Debian stable", or "like RedHat Enterprise Linux" (and its clones).Both provide security updates, but (almost) NO functionality changes. Debian unstable is "whatever's current" (more or less). Fedora Core fills the same role for RedHat. Well, if you want to g

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Kris Deugau
Anthony Edwards wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:37:31PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote: > > Justin Mason wrote: > > > Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's > > > packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from > > > ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:37:31PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote: > Justin Mason wrote: > > Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's > > packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from > > ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves > > the file around

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread John Andersen
On Friday 24 September 2004 08:52 am, Justin Mason wrote: > Bob Apthorpe writes: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION: > > > > > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully yo

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Kris Deugau
Justin Mason wrote: > Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's > packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from > ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves > the file around as Debian does). Actually, for any "real" package manager (ie, rpm or

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Apthorpe writes: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION: > > > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will > > have m

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread David Brodbeck
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:49:48 -0500, Bob Apthorpe wrote > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION: > > > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will > > have missed the f

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION: > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will > have missed the fact that spamd has been moved > from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . Howev

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:30:19AM -0800, John Andersen wrote: > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION: > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will > have missed the fact that spamd has been moved > from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However, the old ve