Ned Slider wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 10:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>>>
>>> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
>>> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescrip
On 06/10/2010 10:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
* 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
* 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
The rules themselves
On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>
> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
>
> The rules themselves are very similar. Should these two be combin
On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>
> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
>
> The rules themselves are very similar. Should these two be combin
