On 1/12/06, Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You shouldn't check mail for non-existent users.
We don't. :) Old users who don't have accounts anymore, but who's
account data still exists in spamassassin.. This data is never
checked, but merely takes up space..
> The best way to clear
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Matthias Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry i accidently sent the previous (incomplete) message...
>>
>> I'm by no means a bayes specialist but i dont think it's a good idea
>> just to delete the oldest entries since SA provides its own mean of
>> purging
From: "Matthias Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you reduce the value of the above directive and issue a
sa-learn --force-expire
it should expire all tokens not needed anymore until it reaches
(approximately) some value lower than the max_db_size
Hope that helps
My understanding is th
On 1/12/06, Matthias Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry i accidently sent the previous (incomplete) message...
>
> I'm by no means a bayes specialist but i dont think it's a good idea
> just to delete the oldest entries since SA provides its own mean of
> purging...
Gotcha.. I kinda knew a
Jason Frisvold wrote:
Hi all,
I've been investigating some recent slowness issues with our mail
servers and I noticed that the spamassassin database is getting rather
large. We process approximately 300,000 mails a day (or more). The
bayes_token database is over 1.8 Gig at the moment. (Actual
Jason Frisvold wrote:
Hi all,
I've been investigating some recent slowness issues with our mail
servers and I noticed that the spamassassin database is getting rather
large. We process approximately 300,000 mails a day (or more). The
bayes_token database is over 1.8 Gig at the moment. (Actual
