From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, basically. However, all rules (ignoring test rules (starts with T_)) get a
score of 1 by default, so you don't need to specifically set a score for
__METARULE. In the end, as long as __METARULE doesn't have a score of zero,
it runs.
So far tha
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:20:57PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> Even that is not clear. The way I interpret that NOW is that the
> __METARULE needs a score of some sort or it will not ever contribute
> to a META rule except via a default score that is independent of the
Yes, a subrule (__) needs a score t
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you want to define a meta-rule, but do not want its individual sub-rules to
count towards the final score unless the entire meta-rule matches, give the
sub-rules names that start with '__' (two underscores). SpamAssassin will
ignore these for scori
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:48:29PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> >If you disable a rule it doesn't run. Period. When your eval is run
> >it'll use a false result in place of a disabled rule. Thus is the rule is
> >a required part of the meta (it's ANDed) then the meta will never fire.
> >If it's an o
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:53:08PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> If the scores are printed out in header fields the scores field can very
> quickly exceed the 4k size limit. This is not a good thing.
Meta subrules (those that start with "__") aren't displayed as part of the
standard rules hits.
--
Random
jdow wrote:
The wording back then suggested you could write a META
rule with components scored zero so that they would not report but the
META would still work.
If I read the runes a-right, that's still how META rules work. Create a
rule like this:
body __CONDITION_1 /something/
...an
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't confuse "the meta rule is executed" with "the meta rule works
as expected".
Sorry, the bad conclusion was already made and depended upon for
proper operation without cluttering the header streams or the report
fields. So the question becomes,
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bret Miller wrote:
So what we're saying here is that if you create a META rule on a
disabled (scored 0) rule, the META rule doesn't work?
Disabled means disabled. Disabled rules are never run.
Quoting the relevant score config info from M:SA:C
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:48:06PM -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
> So what we're saying here is that if you create a META rule on a
> disabled (scored 0) rule, the META rule doesn't work? Didn't work before
> either?
It may have worked somewhat, but probably not as intended. It really depends
on the
Bret Miller wrote:
So what we're saying here is that if you create a META rule on a
disabled (scored 0) rule, the META rule doesn't work?
Disabled means disabled. Disabled rules are never run.
Quoting the relevant score config info from M:SA:Conf POD:
score SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME n.nn [ n.nn n
> >> These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
> >> sa-update.
> >>
> >> [6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
> undefined dependency
> >> 'DCC_CHECK'
> >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
> >> 'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero sco
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steven Stern wrote:
These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
sa-update.
[6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, sokka wrote:
I am trying to upgrade using perl butit still shows Mail::SpamAssassin
isuptodate. Let me know whether the version 3.1.4 is released for perl
installation.
If you're using a CPAN shell, you may need to give the command
"reload index" for it to grab the latest i
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:52:42AM +0530, sokka wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade using perl butit still shows Mail::SpamAssassin
> isuptodate. Let me know whether the version 3.1.4 is released for perl
> installation.
It's not quite clear what you're asking. I think you're
asking if 3.1.4 is avail
Dear Groupmembers,
I am trying to upgrade using perl butit still shows Mail::SpamAssassin isuptodate. Let me know whether the version 3.1.4 is released for perl installation.
regards
> > > Does the upgrade do something like change the default local rules
> > > path, such that the dependency rules can no longer be found? Etc.
> >
> > No, the rules would likely have had these issues for a while (I
> > can't really comment on non-official rules), but with 3.1.4
> > there's now inf
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > Does the upgrade do something like change the default local rules
> > path, such that the dependency rules can no longer be found? Etc.
>
> No, the rules would likely have had these issues for a while (I
> can't really comment on non-official rules)
Hi!
It's just info. Some of your rules have undefined dependencies or are
disabled via a zero score.
That's fairly obvious from the warning message.
I think both OPs point is that a 3.1.3 -> 3.1.4 (i.e. minor version
bugfix) upgrade shouldn't suddenly make a bunch of previously-working
rule
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:21:54AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
> I think both OPs point is that a 3.1.3 -> 3.1.4 (i.e. minor version
> bugfix) upgrade shouldn't suddenly make a bunch of previously-working
> rules simply disappear...
This wouldn't make rules disappear. It's informational output,
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
sa-update.
[6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
...etc
It's just info. Some of your rul
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Steven Stern wrote:
> > These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
> > sa-update.
> >
> > [6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
> > 'DCC_CHECK'
...etc
> It's just info. Some of your rules
Steven Stern wrote:
These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
sa-update.
[6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score
[6837] info
22 matches
Mail list logo
