Am 09.11.2006 um 20:35 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 19:27 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
If your one and only child is busy doing an expire it can't scan
messages too.
ah, so I could increase the number of children running to do this?
You could, running
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 19:27 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
If your one and only child is busy doing an expire it can't scan
messages too.
ah, so I could increase the number of children running to do this?
You could, running at least 2 children if you've got the resources to
Am 09.11.2006 um 19:27 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
If your one and only child is busy doing an expire it can't scan
messages too.
ah, so I could increase the number of children running to do this?
The strange thing is these errors never occurred before last
week and having just upgrad
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 02:10 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
Charlie Clark wrote:
Looks like I'm on top of the resources problem but I am getting "421
delivery errors" even though the e-mails are coming through. This
looks very similar to bug 3828 (which is Spamassassin + Exim).
Am 09.11.2006 um 02:10 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
Charlie Clark wrote:
Looks like I'm on top of the resources problem but I am getting
"421 delivery errors" even though the e-mails are coming through.
This looks very similar to bug 3828 (which is Spamassassin +
Exim). Except this bug sh
Charlie Clark wrote:
Looks like I'm on top of the resources problem but I am getting "421
delivery errors" even though the e-mails are coming through. This looks
very similar to bug 3828 (which is Spamassassin + Exim). Except this bug
should have been closed a long time ago.
Without looking
Am 08.11.2006 um 23:00 schrieb Charlie Clark:
Am 08.11.2006 um 22:45 schrieb Theo Van Dinter:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:18:53PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
How many email to you received by day? (or by minute???)
Excluding spam it's probably less than 50 per day for all
accounts on
thi
Am 08.11.2006 um 22:45 schrieb Theo Van Dinter:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:18:53PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
How many email to you received by day? (or by minute???)
Excluding spam it's probably less than 50 per day for all accounts on
this server! So there shouldn't ever be a problem. I *
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:18:53PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
> >How many email to you received by day? (or by minute???)
>
> Excluding spam it's probably less than 50 per day for all accounts on
> this server! So there shouldn't ever be a problem. I *think* that the
> changes I've made today
Am 08.11.2006 um 20:51 schrieb François Rousseau:
"max-children (set to 1 in this case)."
Why 1???
That's the default for servers run by this ISP. Do you have a
suggestion?
How many email to you received by day? (or by minute???)
Excluding spam it's probably less than 50 per day for a
"max-children (set to 1 in this case)."Why 1???How many email to you received by day? (or by minute???)Francois Rousseau2006/11/8, Charlie Clark <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Am 08.11.2006 um 18:43 schrieb Theo Van Dinter:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:38:19PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:>> 2006-11-08 17:31:0
Am 08.11.2006 um 18:43 schrieb Theo Van Dinter:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:38:19PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
2006-11-08 17:31:00 [9733] i: debug: refresh: 9733 refresh /home/
confixx/web1p2/.spamassassin/bayes.lock
Is this standard behaviour? It seemed okay when the lock is acquired
but see
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:38:19PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
> 2006-11-08 17:31:00 [9733] i: debug: refresh: 9733 refresh /home/
> confixx/web1p2/.spamassassin/bayes.lock
>
> Is this standard behaviour? It seemed okay when the lock is acquired
> but seems to spend most of its time actually re
Am 08.11.2006 um 14:05 schrieb Charlie Clark:
Is it possible to get more information from spamd about why it's
taking so long? Thanks for any help.
Okay,
I have managed to get logging and debugging enabled --syslog file --
debug
which will put debugging information in /spamd.log
It seems
Michael Parker wrote:
By the way, before anyone asks, I have the following in my exim.conf
having been bitten by large emails before, so it's not that:
accept condition = ${if >{$message_size}{500k}{yes}{no}}
That's been working fine until this email started coming through.
500k might still
Andrew Jeffries wrote:
> Andrew Jeffries wrote:
>> I'm running spamassassin 3.1.0 as spamd with the following command line
>> options:
>>
>> -m 5 --max-conn-per-child=5 -u mail --ident-timeout=30 -s
>> /var/log/spamd.log -D --round-robin
>>
>> When I receive a certain email (or a few from the same
Andrew Jeffries wrote:
I'm running spamassassin 3.1.0 as spamd with the following command line
options:
-m 5 --max-conn-per-child=5 -u mail --ident-timeout=30 -s
/var/log/spamd.log -D --round-robin
When I receive a certain email (or a few from the same top level domain)
it hangs spamassassin as
17 matches
Mail list logo
