On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 16:36 -0700, Justin Gould wrote:
> Karsten,
>
> Thank you VERY much for your help with this. You were indeed correct,
> the second scan initiated by Procmail was scanning the report wrapper
> from Postfix and causing the issue. I simply commented out the spamc
> call from P
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 10:57 -0700, Justin Gould wrote:
> I'm relatively new to Postfix, SpamAssassin and what not, so this might
> be a silly question. I'm on SpamAssassin 3.3.1 on Debian Linux with
> Postfix. I've inherited this configuration from a previous
> administrator and am still trying t
