Re: Out of interest

2009-05-16 Thread RW
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:51:09 +0100 Jeremy Morton wrote: > Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to > them? Since it hit PBL you already have networking tests turned-on and have the most useful DNSBLs. It's just a matter of timing, if you run it through again you'll pr

Re: Out of interest

2009-05-16 Thread Ned Slider
Jeremy Morton wrote: Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to them? Please don't top post - it kills the flow of the conversation. Your example hit against spamhaus which is already present in spamassassin: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=117.0.26.235 It's li

Re: Out of interest

2009-05-16 Thread mouss
Jeremy Morton a écrit : > ... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install? > http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html > sorry. lines are numbered and I am too lazy to write a sed script just for that. anyway, 117.0.26.235 is (now) listed on spamhaus (from CBL). > Mine only gives me a

Re: Out of interest

2009-05-16 Thread Jeremy Morton
Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to them? Best regards, Jeremy Morton (Jez) Ned Slider wrote: Jeremy Morton wrote: ... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install? http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html Mine only gives me a Bayesian spam likelihood

Re: Out of interest

2009-05-16 Thread Ned Slider
Jeremy Morton wrote: ... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install? http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html Mine only gives me a Bayesian spam likelihood of 50%, but it seems to use lots of spammy words so I'm not sure why it isn't a lot higher. Even without training shouldn't it