Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-03 Thread mouss
RW a écrit : > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST) > "Benny Pedersen" wrote: > >> On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote: >>> Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being "not a proper DNS" and, as I >>> have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it >>> and go back to using

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-03 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> On 4/2/2009 10:34 PM, Mike Bostock wrote: >> >> If anyone can point me in the direction of some >> assistance I would be very grateful. >> > > http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=3423&page=1 http://www.opendns.com/support/article/33

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-03 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at browsers like spelling correction, and redirecting failures to it's own web servers. The latter presumably breaks the NO_DNS_FOR_FROM test, and I wouldn't be

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Evan Platt
At 05:32 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote: On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote: I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving EVERYTHING - blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc. This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing who set it up for their system. I used

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Aaron Wolfe
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:32 PM, LuKreme wrote: > On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote: >> >> I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving EVERYTHING - >> blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc. > > This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing who > set it up

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, April 3, 2009 02:24, LuKreme wrote: > Or am I wrong? I could be wrong. Bittorrent is slow to :) firefox with proxy to squid on a host with multi-isp uplinks is bad also, since it just use one isp lines that are slow dns is udp, and works very fast if one let it, what uribl can do is to

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread LuKreme
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote: I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving EVERYTHING - blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc. This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing who set it up for their system. I used OpenDNS for quite a while on

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread LuKreme
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:52, RW wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:34:26 +0100 "Mike Bostock" wrote: Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs. named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving 'btinternet.com.mult

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread RW
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST) "Benny Pedersen" wrote: > > On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote: > > Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being "not a proper DNS" and, as I > > have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it > > and go back to using my ISP's DNS serv

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote: > Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being "not a proper DNS" and, as I > have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it > and go back to using my ISP's DNS servers as forwarders. bind works better without forwarders, it common error to

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Mike Bostock wrote: Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being "not a proper DNS" and, as I have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it and go back to using my ISP's DNS servers as forwarders. You still need to keep an eye on it. Several (larger) ISPs have star

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Mike Bostock
In your message regarding Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin dated 02/04/2009, Evan Platt said ... >EP- At 02:52 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:  > >Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for  > >squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are a

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Evan Platt
At 02:52 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote: Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at browsers like spelling correction, and redirecting failures to it's own web servers. The latter presumably breaks the NO_DNS_FOR_

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread RW
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:34:26 +0100 "Mike Bostock" wrote: > Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders > for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs. > > named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving > 'btinternet.com.multi.uribl.com/A/IN': 208.67.22

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-02 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 4/2/2009 10:34 PM, Mike Bostock wrote: Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs. named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving 'btinternet.com.multi.uribl.com/A/IN': 208.67.220.220#53 I am assuming