Re: Not delivering Spam with Procmail

2005-08-11 Thread Nix
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Joe Borg said: > Its easier not to try to count asterisks... > Sample procmailrc portion >:0 > * ^X-Spam-Status:.*score=[1-9][0-9] > { > >:0 > /dev/null > } > -end sample Agreed, but you don't have to use regexps for the counting job either. I use somet

Re: Not delivering Spam with Procmail

2005-08-09 Thread jdow
From: "Bob McClure Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:29:07AM +0200, Joe Borg wrote: Hi, I've setup procmail so as to not deliver mails with a Spam score of 10 or greater, as follows: #Mail that scores 10 or more is not delivered to users. :0 * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\

Re: Not delivering Spam with Procmail

2005-08-09 Thread Bob McClure Jr
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:29:07AM +0200, Joe Borg wrote: > Hi, > I've setup procmail so as to not deliver mails with a Spam score of 10 or > greater, as follows: > > #Mail that scores 10 or more is not delivered to users. > :0 > * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > /var/spool/mail/spam > > A

RE: Not delivering Spam with Procmail

2005-08-09 Thread Joe Borg
-Original Message- From: John Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 August 2005 09:52 To: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Not delivering Spam with Procmail On Monday 08 August 2005 11:29 pm, Joe Borg wrote: > Hi, > I've setup procmail so as to

Re: Not delivering Spam with Procmail

2005-08-09 Thread John Andersen
On Monday 08 August 2005 11:29 pm, Joe Borg wrote: > Hi, > I've setup procmail so as to not deliver mails with a Spam score of 10 or > greater, as follows: > > #Mail that scores 10 or more is not delivered to users. > > :0 > > * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > /var/spool/mail/spam > > As may