On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 09:26 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 3:25 AM, ercibrest wrote:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_12LTRDOM,
> > RDNS_NONE,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,TVD_SPACE_RATIO_MINFP shortcircuit=no
> > autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
^
On 11/22/2011 3:25 AM, ercibrest wrote:
> need to see the rule hits for the negative scores..
>
> also I don't see any RBL, URIBL, pyzor or razor scores in there, have you
> disabled network tests? these are really valuable - just make sure you
> only choose a couple of the RBL's (see
> http://wik
Darxus wrote:
>
> On 11/21, ercibrest wrote:
>> Maybe there is a problem of configuration because all of my emails come
>> from
>> the same IP. From internet, email send to my domain is receive from my
>> provider and then, the provider relay mails to my mailscanner 's server.
>
> Add that IP
need to see the rule hits for the negative scores..
also I don't see any RBL, URIBL, pyzor or razor scores in there, have you
disabled network tests? these are really valuable - just make sure you
only choose a couple of the RBL's (see
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=maq:index#getting
On 11/21, ercibrest wrote:
> Maybe there is a problem of configuration because all of my emails come from
> the same IP. From internet, email send to my domain is receive from my
> provider and then, the provider relay mails to my mailscanner 's server.
Add that IP to your trusted_networks setting
need to see the rule hits for the negative scores..
also I don't see any RBL, URIBL, pyzor or razor scores in there, have you
disabled network tests? these are really valuable - just make sure you
only choose a couple of the RBL's (see
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=maq:index#getting_th
