Re: NO_RELAYS does not trigger when all received is 127.0.0.1

2009-05-13 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, May 13, 2009 05:17, Matt Kettler wrote: > In that case the local host is considered a "relay", even though it's > relaying to itself. yes > Really NO_RELAYS really means "NO_MTAS", i.e.: no parseable Received: > headers. okay i learn it then, thanks for explaining it -- http://localh

Re: NO_RELAYS does not trigger when all received is 127.0.0.1

2009-05-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Benny Pedersen wrote: > so when does NO_RELAYS trigger ? > > i spouted this today as one email sent with smtp localy here, spamassassin > says all trusted, with is imho okay, but i think it should be NO_RELAYS > and not ALL_TRUSTED > > is this a config error i have done or ? > In that case the l