Re: NOT_TO_ME

2004-10-29 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Loren Wilton wrote: That rule sounds suspeciously like one I wrote a long time ago, and once posted here. If it is, then the problem is probably the double-quoting in the display name of the To line, or the fact that the display name happens to match the email address rather than something like "J

Re: NOT_TO_ME

2004-10-29 Thread Loren Wilton
That rule sounds suspeciously like one I wrote a long time ago, and once posted here. If it is, then the problem is probably the double-quoting in the display name of the To line, or the fact that the display name happens to match the email address rather than something like "Jonathan Nichols".

Re: NOT_TO_ME

2004-10-28 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:33:44PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > tests=BAYES_90, > HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE, NOT_TO_ME > > WHat would have triggered the "NOT_TO_ME" rule? I don't understand that > rule very much... :( There is no standard rule named NOT_TO_ME ... You'll have to lookup your