Re: Missing rules

2014-08-08 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/8/2014 9:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > >your rules are apparently out of sync, some define score for RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 >but do not define the rules... Which is why I asked the question. Any rule named RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 is unlikely to have been composed by myself and no-one else has author

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-08 Thread James B. Byrne
On Fri, August 8, 2014 09:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 06.08.14 16:19, James B. Byrne wrote: >>OS=CentOS-6.5 >>SA=3.3.1 >> >>I ran spamassassin -D -llint and see this in the output: >> >>Aug 6 15:59:03.983 [4533] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent >>rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.08.14 16:19, James B. Byrne wrote: OS=CentOS-6.5 SA=3.3.1 I ran spamassassin -D -llint and see this in the output: Aug 6 15:59:03.983 [4533] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 did you run sa-update? Do you use sa-compile? your rules are apparently

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-07 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, August 07, 2014 10:37 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne" wrote: On Wed, August 6, 2014 17:30, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:24 PM -0400 "James B. Byrne" wrote: I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro packager (RedHat). When

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-07 Thread James B. Byrne
On Thu, August 7, 2014 15:53, Bob Proulx wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: >> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> > Policies such as this show a complete lack of understanding on how to run >> > production infrastructure. RH will never update SA in RHEL6 to any new >> > release. Your best course of actio

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-07 Thread Bob Proulx
James B. Byrne wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > Policies such as this show a complete lack of understanding on how to run > > production infrastructure. RH will never update SA in RHEL6 to any new > > release. Your best course of action is to fix your broken policy. Failing > > that, you

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-07 Thread Dave Pooser
On 8/7/14, 9:37 AM, "James B. Byrne" wrote: >Which explains, of course, why Linux distributions belonging to the >RedHAt/CentOs/ScientificLinux/RHOS/ClearOS family are so lacking in >popularity >and so seldom found in corporate environments. Those distros are popular because corporate environmen

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-07 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed, August 6, 2014 17:30, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:24 PM -0400 "James B. Byrne" > wrote: > >> I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro >> packager (RedHat). When they update SA then, and only then, will I get >> the upgrade. >

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread Philip Prindeville
On Aug 6, 2014, at 3:24 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Wed, August 6, 2014 16:27, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> >>> >> >> MSPIKE = MailSpike RBL. >> >> Without checking, you are running an old version of SA and the rules are >> not valid on your installation so it's skipping them. It's inno

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread Bob Proulx
James B. Byrne wrote: > I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro packager > (RedHat). When they update SA then, and only then, will I get the upgrade. If Red Hat is like other packagers then they are depending upon sa-update to populate /var/lib/spamassassin/ with updat

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/6/2014 5:24 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: On Wed, August 6, 2014 16:27, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: MSPIKE = MailSpike RBL. Without checking, you are running an old version of SA and the rules are not valid on your installation so it's skipping them. It's innocuous and by design that you are skip

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread Axb
On 08/06/2014 11:24 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro packager (RedHat). When they update SA then, and only then, will I get the upgrade. as a wise man named Benny Pedersen once said: "you live in a precompiled problem" SCR

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:24 PM -0400 "James B. Byrne" wrote: I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro packager (RedHat). When they update SA then, and only then, will I get the upgrade. Policies such as this show a complete lack of understanding on how to

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed, August 6, 2014 16:27, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> > > MSPIKE = MailSpike RBL. > > Without checking, you are running an old version of SA and the rules are > not valid on your installation so it's skipping them. It's innocuous > and by design that you are skipping those rules. Upgrading t

Re: Missing rules

2014-08-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/6/2014 4:19 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: OS=CentOS-6.5 SA=3.3.1 I ran spamassassin -D -llint and see this in the output: Aug 6 15:59:03.983 [4533] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 Aug 6 15:59:03.983 [4533] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existe

RE: Missing rules at the Emporium?

2004-12-10 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> rulesemporium just moved to a new server. Looks like some of the files didn't make it. > >> Is it just me or are the following rules missing? >> >> 70_sare_unsub.cf >> 70_sare_uri.cf > i dont see those 2 files in the packs phil sent me dunno what to tell ya. d

Re: Missing rules at the Emporium?

2004-12-10 Thread Loren Wilton
Title: Missing rules at the Emporium? rulesemporium just moved to a new server.  Looks like some of the files didn't make it.           Loren - Original Message - From: Robert Leonard Cc: SA List Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 7:35 AM Subject: Missing rules at th

RE: Missing rules at the Emporium?

2004-12-10 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: Missing rules at the Emporium? SARE has moved to a new home. Its possible these didn't get moved over.   And SARE is working on a new surprise. More testing needed. :)   --Chris -Original Message-From: Robert Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, December 10, 200