Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

From: "Nix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled: And while my mind is fertile (as in full of ) today I just flashed on the concept of a modified SpamAssassin tool as a "RepeatAssassin" for mailinglists. If an issue has come up before it fires off the WHOLE thread t

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled: > And while my mind is fertile (as in full of ) today I just flashed > on the concept of a modified SpamAssassin tool as a "RepeatAssassin" for > mailinglists. If an issue has come up before it fires off the WHOLE thread > to the (hapless) repeat poste

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 3/18/2006 10:34 PM, jdow wrote: From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 3/18/2006 9:03 PM, jdow wrote: Yah know, that does suggest there should be a "whitelist_to" option for those who setup honeypot accounts. (That way, Theo, spa

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

On 3/18/2006 10:34 PM, jdow wrote: From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 3/18/2006 9:03 PM, jdow wrote: Yah know, that does suggest there should be a "whitelist_to" option for those who setup honeypot accounts. (That way, Theo, spam COULD be sent to this list. I'm pretty sure

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 3/18/2006 9:03 PM, jdow wrote: Yah know, that does suggest there should be a "whitelist_to" option for those who setup honeypot accounts. (That way, Theo, spam COULD be sent to this list. I'm pretty sure SpamAssassin already has a similar fea

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

On 3/18/2006 9:03 PM, jdow wrote: Yah know, that does suggest there should be a "whitelist_to" option for those who setup honeypot accounts. (That way, Theo, spam COULD be sent to this list. I'm pretty sure SpamAssassin already has a similar feature. I think it's called whitelist_to. :)

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Philip Prindeville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt Kettler wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote: Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL ASF email, not just th

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

From: "Philip Prindeville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:05:03PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote: Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server t

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

From: "Philip Prindeville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt Kettler wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote: Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL ASF email, not just this list. There's no way that y

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> >>> >> you can do that and more, but you'll first need to crack the ASF servers ;-p >> >> >> > > And there's no way to get the admin on that system to tweak the local rules? Erm.. No... Remember, this is a COMMON server that serves the lists for many, if not A

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 02:41:46PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: > >>>Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers > >>>ALL > >>>ASF email, not just this list. > > And there's no way to get the admin on that system to tweak the local rules? As Matt stated earlier

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

mouss wrote: >Philip Prindeville a écrit : > > >>Matt Kettler wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? >>>Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server th

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

Philip Prindeville a écrit : > Matt Kettler wrote: > > >>Philip Prindeville wrote: >> >> >> >>>Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? >>> >>> >> >>Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL >>ASF email, not just this list. >> >> > > > Ther

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:05:03PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > >>Philip Prindeville wrote: >> >> >>>Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? >>> >>> >>Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL >>ASF email, not

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

Matt Kettler wrote: >Philip Prindeville wrote: > > >>Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? >> >> > >Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL >ASF email, not just this list. > > There's no way that you can add a rule that says if the me

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:05:03PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Philip Prindeville wrote: > > Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? > Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL > ASF email, not just this list. Generally, instead of posting spam e

Re: Message to list rejected because it's too spamful!

Philip Prindeville wrote: > Grrr... Can we enable whitelisting for list members? Read the archives, in short, no, because it's a blanket server that covers ALL ASF email, not just this list.