the .procmailrc is pretty straight forward - it's attached below.
Basically all it does is scan for spam, then deliver to the users
inbox. This particular user is still using the old mbox format... but
that shouldn't matter.
The procmail log for this message is completely normal:
From @ Fri
Chris Henry-7 wrote:
>
> Matus -
>
> No I didn't pass the --headers option to spamc. All the other messages
> in my system include the original message - this is the only one out of
> millions that stripped it.
>
> -Chris H
>
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 02.09.08 12:01, Chris Hen
Matus -
No I didn't pass the --headers option to spamc. All the other messages
in my system include the original message - this is the only one out of
millions that stripped it.
-Chris H
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 02.09.08 12:01, Chris Henry wrote:
The problem is that it appears t
On 02.09.08 12:01, Chris Henry wrote:
> The problem is that it appears that spamassassin stripped the original
> message out after it flagged it as spam. I am running Exim 4.63 with
> SpamAssassin 3.2.5 being called via procmail.
don't you use the '--headers' option to spamc? It causes spamd re
