Hi,
> * 1.8 MIME_IMAGE_JPG contains wrong MIME type image\\/jpg
>
> That rule is nowhere in the current standard rules or the KAM rules.
>
> If you don't like your custom local rules, only you can change them.
>
Ah, thanks. Usually my local rules are indicated as such, so I didn't even
realize
On 2022-09-25 at 13:35:51 UTC-0400 (Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:35:51 -0400)
Alex
is rumored to have said:
> Hi,
>
> I've asked variations of this question in the past, but I'm still not sure
> what to do about it. Should an email with just an image attachment, with no
> subject and no body be treated as
"Loren Wilton" writes:
> Are these messages that are being sent by individuals from their phones?
> Or is there some program that is sending these?
> I can see it being too much work to type a subject if you are just texting a
> snapshot to someone else on another phone, but if it is a program,
It sure seems to me like people are just using email to share pictures
(licenses, l
egal docs, as well as pictures of the kids.)
Are these messages that are being sent by individuals from their phones?
Or is there some program that is sending these?
I can see it being too much work to type a su
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 1:56 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 25.09.22 13:35, Alex wrote:
> >I've asked variations of this question in the past, but I'm still not sure
> >what to do about it. Should an email with just an image attachment, with
> no
> >subject and no body be treated as spam?
On 25.09.22 13:35, Alex wrote:
I've asked variations of this question in the past, but I'm still not sure
what to do about it. Should an email with just an image attachment, with no
subject and no body be treated as spam? This is the circumstance where
users are using email as a file transfer dev
