> Tony Baker schrieb:
>
>> Everything seems fine,
>> then yesterday I replied to an external piece of mail and CC'd a couple
>> of colleagues on the reply.
>>
>> The mail was marked as SPAM
>
> Which copy of mail was marked as SPAM - the one that went to the
> outside, or the one that went to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Baker schrieb:
> Everything seems fine,
> then yesterday I replied to an external piece of mail and CC'd a couple
> of colleagues on the reply.
>
> The mail was marked as SPAM
Which copy of mail was marked as SPAM - the one that went to the
o
On 9 Nov 2007, at 12:39, wolfgang wrote:
In an older episode (Friday, 9. November 2007), Tony Baker wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.373 tagged_above=-999 required=2.7
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=9.772, BAYES_00=-2.599]
AWL=9.772: This seems to indicate that a recent mail with your add
In an older episode (Friday, 9. November 2007), Tony Baker wrote:
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.373 tagged_above=-999 required=2.7
> > tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=9.772, BAYES_00=-2.599]
>
AWL=9.772: This seems to indicate that a recent mail with your address
in the From: header was tagged as
Tony Baker wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I have recently updated Spamassassin (3.2.3), amavis-new and clamav.
>
>
> Everything seems fine,
> then yesterday I replied to an external piece of mail and CC'd a
> couple of colleagues on the reply.
>
> The mail was marked as SPAM
>
> Part of the headers as follows:
Tony Baker wrote:
> The mail was marked as SPAM
>
> Part of the headers as follows:
>> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at co.uk
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Score: 5.373
>> X-Spam-Level: *
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.373 tagged_above=-999 required=2.7
>> tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=9.772, B
