Re: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread Chris Lear
Bret Miller wrote: >> I'm more interested in the Image signatures it has. If >> they're really >> useful and reliable. I expect that keeping up with image >> spam wouldn't >> be very scalable, but it might at least help reduce some load >> (since we >> do virus scanning before letting Spam Assas

Re: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread Dirk Bonengel
John Rudd schrieb: Bret Miller wrote: On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:35 am, Bret Miller wrote: Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? I'm running it in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an opinion before doing anything serious with it. TIA, Bret

Re: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems)
John Rudd said: > I'm more interested in the Image signatures it has. If they're really > useful and reliable. I expect that keeping up with image spam wouldn't > be very scalable, but it might at least help reduce some load (since we > do virus scanning before letting Spam Assassin see a mess

RE: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread Bret Miller
> I'm more interested in the Image signatures it has. If > they're really > useful and reliable. I expect that keeping up with image > spam wouldn't > be very scalable, but it might at least help reduce some load > (since we > do virus scanning before letting Spam Assassin see a message) for > wh

Re: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread John Rudd
Bret Miller wrote: On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:35 am, Bret Miller wrote: Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? I'm running it in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an opinion before doing anything serious with it. TIA, Bret Bret, on my home sys

RE: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread Bret Miller
> > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:35 am, Bret Miller wrote: > > > Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? > I'm running it > > > in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here > had an opinion > > > before doing anything serious with it. > > > > > > TIA, > > > Bret > >

RE: MSRBL

2006-12-15 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
> -Original Message- > From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:55 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: MSRBL > > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:35 am, Bret Miller wrote: > > Has anyone here tried MSRBL

Re: MSRBL

2006-12-13 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:35 am, Bret Miller wrote: > Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? I'm running it > in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an opinion > before doing anything serious with it. > > TIA, > Bret Bret, on my home system I use the

RE: MSRBL

2006-12-13 Thread Bret Miller
> > Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? > I'm running > > it in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an > > opinion before doing anything serious with it. > > I ran it here for a few hours with rblsmtpd and it got 0 hits, which > also means 0 FP's on a very

Re: MSRBL

2006-12-13 Thread Rick Macdougall
Bret Miller wrote: Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? I'm running it in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an opinion before doing anything serious with it. I ran it here for a few hours with rblsmtpd and it got 0 hits, which also means 0 FP's on a