On Tuesday, April 26, 2005, 3:19:02 PM, John Stewart wrote:
>> Use the test point, this should hit one of the SURBL lists,
>> but I forget
>> if it shows up as WS or SC:
>>
>> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com/
> For this it only hits SPAMCOP_URI_RBL. Is this normal? (it sounds like it'
Stewart, John wrote:
>>Use the test point, this should hit one of the SURBL lists,
>>but I forget
>>if it shows up as WS or SC:
>>
>>
>>
>
>For this it only hits SPAMCOP_URI_RBL. Is this normal? (it sounds like it's
>supposed to trigger more, I thought)
>
>
>
No, it's only supposed to hit
> Use the test point, this should hit one of the SURBL lists,
> but I forget
> if it shows up as WS or SC:
>
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com/
For this it only hits SPAMCOP_URI_RBL. Is this normal? (it sounds like it's
supposed to trigger more, I thought)
thanks!
johnS
Paul Fielding wrote:
>Matt Kettler evi-inc.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>Also, make sure your Net::DNS is sufficiently up-to-date so that the
>>URIBL tests (SURBL, etc) can run. Look to make sure you've got some spam
>>hitting URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_WS_SURBL, etc.
>>
>>
>
>
>Any suggestions on testin
Matt Kettler evi-inc.com> writes:
> Also, make sure your Net::DNS is sufficiently up-to-date so that the
> URIBL tests (SURBL, etc) can run. Look to make sure you've got some spam
> hitting URIBL_SC_SURBL, URIBL_WS_SURBL, etc.
Any suggestions on testing that the ability of URIBL tests to run?
> To up hit rate I'd recommend adding the SARE random ruleset, and the
> tripwire ruleset.
Incidentally, you'll find custom rulesets defined here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Some of our ruleset writers should edit this page so it's more
current
Bret
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have been using SA for the past year and a half with detection
> rates around 95% or better (based on client feedback). Over the past
> couple days (since Thursday April 21st) we have been getting lots of
> spam making it through with detection rates at
Greetings Martin:
Use surbl.
Thank you.
At 04:18 PM 4/25/2005, you wrote:
Hi
All,
We have been using SA for the past year and a
half with detection rates around 95% or better (based on client
feedback). Over the past couple days (since Thursday April 21st) we
have been getting lots of spam ma
