>
> This should be fairly easy to do: configure SA with the
> language(s) you will accept and the ratio of misspellings to
> total words that you'll accept as meaning 'unwanted language'
> after numbers and HTML tags have been excluded from the
> check. Apply the test to the whole body of a
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 08:55 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Except for very short messages I would think that if you spell checked
the message in several languages and found that 80% was spelled
correctly that you have a match. You wouldn't have to check every
la
Please, could you configure your MUA to quote, instead of colouring?
HTML mail sucks.
On 07.12.09 08:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
>Any chance someone might be interested in a radical redesign? I think
>language exclusion would be an extremely effective spam deterrent as email
>in a language
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 08:55 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> Except for very short messages I would think that if you spell checked
> the message in several languages and found that 80% was spelled
> correctly that you have a match. You wouldn't have to check every
> language, just start with some com
On 7-Dec-2009, at 09:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Any chance someone might be interested in a radical redesign? I think
> language exclusion would be an extremely effective spam deterrent as email in
> a language you don't speak is definitely spam.
Erm… not necessarily. As a general rule, this mig
Matt Kettler wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved.
Here's the situation.
It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the
languages you want and it returns many possibilities so as not to
trigger unwanted
On 06.12.09 11:39, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved.
> Here's the situation.
>
> It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the
> languages you want and it returns many possibilities so as not to
> trigger unwanted fal
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:49:25PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
> > I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved.
> > Here's the situation.
> >
> > It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the
> > languages you want and it returns many
Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved.
> Here's the situation.
>
> It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the
> languages you want and it returns many possibilities so as not to
> trigger unwanted falsely.
>
> What I'm doing
Thanks Dan,
How would I return the language found in the message in the report
results? All I want to do is detect the language and return the results
to Exim where I'll process it.
McDonald, Dan wrote:
The textcat plugin does a fair job. It's part of the default build,
but not enabled by de
The textcat plugin does a fair job. It's part of the default build,
but not enabled by default.
On Dec 5, 2009, at 10:03 AM, "Marc Perkel" wrote:
Are there any rules to determine what language a message is in?
11 matches
Mail list logo
