Ok, thanks.
Everything is working now. and yes, spamassassin —lint returns nothing.
I had probably just got outputs confused somewhere along the line. The —lint -D
log now also shows no warnings.
thanks
Robert
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 13:27, RW wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:05:11 +
> rob..
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:05:11 +
rob...@chalmers.com.au wrote:
> In the original email I posted, I'm asking two questions.
> 1. I'm getting two warnings about nonexistent rules. Is this fixable?
That's because you created descriptions for rules that don't exist.
Either you did something wrong o
In the original email I posted, I'm asking two questions.
1. I'm getting two warnings about nonexistent rules. Is this fixable? And
2. why is lint reporting a random set of 13 missing descriptions when I have
actually put those descriptions into local.cf?
As to the descriptions themselves, it's
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:11:12 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 07.03.2016 um 19:05 schrieb RW:
> > If someone gets around to creating descriptions for these rules you
> > wont see them
>
> maybe *you* won't see them, others do
>
> they are part of the report-headers instead something like
I kn
On 3/7/2016 1:05 PM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:12:25 +
Robert Chalmers wrote:
I?ve added descriptions, grabbing the actual RULE name with awk, and
creating the list that way.
{
a=$12;
print "describe " a " Spam check applied.";
}
The result is like this.
describe L
Am 07.03.2016 um 19:05 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:12:25 +
Robert Chalmers wrote:
The result is like this.
describe LONG_TERM_PRICE Spam check applied.
describe MULTIPART_ALT_NON_TEXT Spam check applied.
describe TVD_IP_OCT Spam check applied.
describe HK_NAME_DR Spam check applied.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:12:25 +
Robert Chalmers wrote:
> I?ve added descriptions, grabbing the actual RULE name with awk, and
> creating the list that way.
>
> {
> a=$12;
> print "describe " a " Spam check applied.";
> }
>
>
> The result is like this.
> describe LONG_TERM_PRICE
I’ve added descriptions, grabbing the actual RULE name with awk, and creating
the list that way.
{
a=$12;
print "describe " a " Spam check applied.";
}
The result is like this.
describe LONG_TERM_PRICE Spam check applied.
describe MULTIPART_ALT_NON_TEXT Spam check applied.
descr
Yes well, back again.
sa-update is running, and supposedly updating rules.
spam assassin -D —lint still shows a long list… however, no longer shows that
first one from a while back…
Feb 12 09:09:30.977 [73122] dbg: config: warning: no description set for
HK_SCAM_N2
Feb 12 09:09:30.977 [73122]
Am 08.02.2016 um 19:18 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Robert Chalmers:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
they should be part of the rules itself and i don't understand why
rule writes don't
Thanks folks. As they are cosmetic, I'll worry about them later...
I now know how to fix it up though, so it wont take long.
I'll also check rule update is going on.
thanks
-
From my iPhone.
> On 8 Feb 2016, at 6:18 pm, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Robert Chalmers:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
they should be part of the rules itself and i don't understand why rule
writes don't run "-D --lint" regulary *before* publish
I
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Robert Chalmers wrote:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
Feb 8 17:44:07.199 [15545] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule DUP_SUSP_HDR
Feb 8 17:44:07.205 [15545] dbg: config: warning: no description set for
STOX_AND_PR
Am 08.02.2016 um 19:06 schrieb Bill Cole:
You *COULD* add descriptions for rules with missing descriptions in
local.cf, but why bother?
well, because looking for warnings because local modifications is much
easier when the stock install don't produce them at all
signature.asc
Description
Am 08.02.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Robert Chalmers:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
they should be part of the rules itself and i don't understand why rule
writes don't run "-D --lint" regulary *before* publish
"describe RULNE_NAME description" in local.c
On 8 Feb 2016, at 12:58, Robert Chalmers wrote:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D
—lint
Feb 8 17:44:07.199 [15545] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule DUP_SUSP_HDR
Feb 8 17:44:07.205 [15545] dbg: config: warning: no description set
for STOX
16 matches
Mail list logo
