El 21/08/2014 11:26, Axb escribió:
On 08/21/2014 12:16 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Although this mail doesn't seem to be spam, it is always marked as
it would be by Google. I just don't understand what makes Google think
it is!
If it is marked by Google, it has nothing to do with your SA.
IMHO,
On 08/21/2014 12:16 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Although this mail doesn't seem to be spam, it is always marked as
it would be by Google. I just don't understand what makes Google think
it is!
If it is marked by Google, it has nothing to do with your SA.
IMHO, Google is not making such a good jo
El 21/08/2014 11:16, Olivier Nicole escribió:
Although this mail doesn't seem to be spam, it is always marked as
it would be by Google. I just don't understand what makes Google think
it is!
If it is marked by Google, it has nothing to do with your SA.
I know, I was just answering the previous
On 08/21/2014 12:11 PM, Nicolás wrote:
El 21/08/2014 11:07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote:
Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct' DNS
host appears in the header, but is still marked as spam.
On 20.08.14 20:14, Nicolás wrote:
This
> Although this mail doesn't seem to be spam, it is always marked as
> it would be by Google. I just don't understand what makes Google think
> it is!
If it is marked by Google, it has nothing to do with your SA.
IMHO, Google is not making such a good job as marking spam, I get way to
many FP (ma
El 21/08/2014 11:07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote:
Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct' DNS
host appears in the header, but is still marked as spam.
On 20.08.14 20:14, Nicolás wrote:
This would be the latest test:
X-Spam-Che
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote:
Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct'
DNS host appears in the header, but is still marked as spam.
On 20.08.14 20:14, Nicolás wrote:
This would be the latest test:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on vps81
El 20/08/2014 19:55, John Hardin escribió:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote:
El 20/08/2014 15:29, Axb escribió:
get fcRDNS ...OVH lets you set a correct rdns for you hostname.
Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct' DNS
host appears in the header, but is still mar
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote:
El 20/08/2014 15:29, Axb escribió:
get fcRDNS ...OVH lets you set a correct rdns for you hostname.
Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct' DNS host
appears in the header, but is still marked as spam.
Any other idea?
Please post
El 20/08/2014 15:29, Axb escribió:
On 08/20/2014 04:24 PM, Nicolás wrote:
The only one tip I have right now is that the reverse DNS query of the
server's resolves to a different host than the one sent in EHLO, but in
that case I don't know how to avoid that since the hosting where the
dedicated
On 08/20/2014 04:24 PM, Nicolás wrote:
The only one tip I have right now is that the reverse DNS query of the
server's resolves to a different host than the one sent in EHLO, but in
that case I don't know how to avoid that since the hosting where the
dedicated server is located automatically ass
11 matches
Mail list logo
