On 20.02.17 08:58, David Niklas wrote:
I have had a wonderful experience filtering spam with spamassassin.
However, within the past few weeks (since feb 7th, I think), I have gotten
a number of messages that have been normal but marked as spam.
It may be those that I am speaking with and what the
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, David Jones wrote:
From: David Niklas
However, within the past few weeks (since feb 7th, I think), I have gotten
a number of messages that have been normal but marked as spam.
URIBL_BLOCKED is the problem.
URIBL_BLOCKED is not an indicator for false *positives*.
It sho
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:40:15 +
David Jones wrote:
> >From: David Niklas
>
> >Feb 18 04:24:46 [spamd] spamd: connection from ulgy_thing
> >[127.0.0.1]:38282 to port 783, fd 5_ Feb 18 04:24:46 [spamd] spamd:
> >setuid to me succeeded_ Feb 18 04:24:46 [spamd] spamd: checking
> >message <201702
>From: David Niklas
>Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 7:58 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Great spam filtering, until now
>Hello,
>I have had a wonderful experience filtering spam with spamassassin.
>However, within the past few weeks (since feb 7th, I think), I have gotten
>a
David Niklas skrev den 2017-02-20 14:58:
AWL,BAYES_00,CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,RDN
S_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED
scantime=6.7,size=4240,user=me,uid=1000,required_score=5.0,rhost=ulgy_thing,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=38282,mid=
