Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has helped in this
thread:
Great job. Seriously. Some good answers here. Can we we all take a minute to
make sure these answers are posted somewhere on the SA wiki's for future
reference? Its been a while since we had a p
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:14 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has
helped in this
Title: RE: General assistance
> -Original Message-
> From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: General assistance
>
>
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> > I would l
Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has helped in this
thread:
Great job. Seriously. Some good answers here. Can we we all take a minute to
make sure these answers are posted somewhere on the SA wiki's for future
reference? Its been a while since we had a p
Title: RE: General assistance
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has helped in this thread:
Great job. Seriously. Some good answers here. Can we we all take a minute to make sure these answers are posted somewhere on the SA wiki's for future reference? Its been a
On Feb 14, 2006, at 10:47 AM, DAve wrote:
Daniel Cañas Montero wrote:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Ed Russell wrote:
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed
to this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever
was. I have
done the following:
1
Daniel Cañas Montero wrote:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Ed Russell wrote:
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed to this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever was.
I have
done the following:
1.Installed djbdns and I am using dnscache
is cheap since supply always exceeds demand.
---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cañas Montero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:14 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
On Feb 11
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Ed Russell wrote:
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed to
this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever
was. I have
done the following:
1. Installed djbdns and I am using dnscache as I was told. I have
inc
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or
razor? Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to
either?
I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely
che
Talk is cheap since supply always exceeds demand.
---
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:20 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: General assistance
DAve
DAve wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > DAve wrote:
> >
> > > Ed Russell wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or
> > > > razor? Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to
> > > > either?
> > >
> > > I use neither, though I think I am in th
that has been answered already.
Once again, thanks so much to everyone. This group is simply amazing.
I second that!
DAve
Ed
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assist
> b. Does anyone have any utilities to get statistics from SA? Such as
Can't help you on your first question, but likely someone else can.
On the second question, there are two different stats scripts. Confusingly
enough they are BOTH named sa_stats.pl.
One is distributed with SA itself. I fo
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Ed Russell wrote:
> User validation is going to be tough or all but impossible. This box
> forwards off the mail to an NT box running SL Mail. There is no easy way
to
most part
it works. We just ensure that we are not too aggressive on the rules.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:28 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
No, Ed, qmail-scanner should not ini
On Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 22:42 Ed Russell wrote:
> I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du
> Jour. I see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose
> from when utilizing this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones
> would be safe?
I use those:
SARE_ADUL
On Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 19:32 Ed Russell wrote:
> 1. Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I
> know there are quite a few.
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, multi.surbl.org, safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
dnsbl.njabl.org, bl.spamcop.net, relays.ordb.org
I use those at MTA level. That drop
ECTED]
3-)(#$*&&&!"
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2006 February, 10, Friday 20:11
Subject: RE: General assistance
I think you are confused as to how I have set this up. Qmail-scanner is my
replacement qmail queue
: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
From: "Ed Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
> utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have
From: "Ed Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have been using for
some time which acts as a pass-through filter for many domains (currently
about 100) for spam, this is a fairly
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:30 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or razor?
Is one better than the other? Are there
//cr.yp.to/djbdns.html. It can log in a very
verbose way, generating gigabytes of log files a day.
What you have above for Bind.
DAve
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:28 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General
I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du Jour. I
see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose from when
utilizing
this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones would be safe?
I use these:
SARE_ADULT
SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM
SARE_FRAUD
SARE_HEADER0
SARE_HEA
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Ed Russell wrote:
> If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
> utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have been using for
> some time which acts as a pass-through filter for many domains
> (cur
supply always exceeds demand.
---
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:30 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> DAve wrote:
>
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or razor?
Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to either?
I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely check
my spam and I have found that bayes, ray
DAve wrote:
> Ed Russell wrote:
> >
> > 2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or razor?
> > Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to either?
>
> I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely check
> my spam and I have found that bayes, rayzor
e. Right now SARE_OEM and
SARE_STOCK are helping out. Next week it might be SARE_ADULT.
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Ed Russell wrote:
User validation is
Ed Russell wrote:
> 1.Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I know
> there are quite a few.
openrbl.org has a reasonably comprehensive list.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: General assistance
>
> My homework is:
>
> 1.Install and configure dnscache.
> 2.Look into
should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or razor? Is
one better than the other? Are there advantages to either?
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Ed Russell wrote:
> U
s@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: General assistance
-Original Message-
From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:51 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: General assistance
Am I completely off base in the way I have this all setup? I hav
: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: General assistance
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
Absolutely do user verification. I can throw out from 20% to 80% of my
traffic depending on the current level of dictionary and Joe-Job
attacks. Since you
.
---
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:51 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: General assistance
DAve wrote:
> Ed Russell wrote:
> >
> > No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
>
&g
---
Talk is cheap since supply always exceeds demand.
---
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:39 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Ed
DAve wrote:
> Ed Russell wrote:
> >
> > No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
>
> Absolutely do user verification. I can throw out from 20% to 80% of my
> traffic depending on the current level of dictionary and Joe-Job
> attacks. Since you are processing ahead of your clients Exchange bo
Ed Russell wrote:
>
> No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
You really should consider finding a way to do user verification at the
MTA level. You can greatly reduce your server's load if you don't
accept mail for nonexistent users.
To give you an example, so far today my server has rej
I need consider?
Ed
---
Talk is cheap since supply always exceeds demand.
---
-Original Message-
From: Kristopher Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Ed Russell wrote:
If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have been using for
some time which acts as a pass-through filter for many domains (currently
about 100) for spam, this is a fairly high traffic server pr
2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: General assistance
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: General assistance
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: General assistance
>
> Am I completely off base in the way I have this all setup? I have
went
> with
> a higher speed HD to increase
42 matches
Mail list logo
