John Thompson wrote:
No. I use Thunderbird and just set the Junk filter controls to expire
junk messages after a couple weeks.
Interesting idea! Thanks for the tips! You have no idea how much time
and how many steps this is going to save me.
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/i
On 2008-01-24, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Isn't that what "cron" is for? :-)
>>
>> I have a cron job on my imap server to regularly feed ham and spam
>> through sa-learn.
> I have a cron job that runs the learning process nightly. I was
> refering
On 2008-01-24, Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Thompson wrote:
>
>> Isn't that what "cron" is for? :-)
>>
>> I have a cron job on my imap server to regularly feed ham and spam
>> through sa-learn.
> Do you delete the messages from the IMAP folder after you learn them?
> If so, h
Diego Pomatta wrote:
John Thompson escribió:
On 2008-01-23, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7k)
and Junk (53.172k). The msf file must be some kind of index. I just
feed the biggest one to sa-learn?
Yup. Use "s
John Thompson escribió:
On 2008-01-23, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7k)
and Junk (53.172k). The msf file must be some kind of index. I just feed
the biggest one to sa-learn?
Yup. Use "sa-learn --spam --mbox
John Thompson wrote:
On 2008-01-23, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My intention was to manually feed the few spam messages that slip thru
undetected. By the time I get a hold of those, they are in the
recipient's mail client inbox, not in the server.
I was thinking, if I save the m
John Thompson wrote:
Isn't that what "cron" is for? :-)
I have a cron job on my imap server to regularly feed ham and spam
through sa-learn.
Do you delete the messages from the IMAP folder after you learn them?
If so, how do you go about that? I'm pretty sure if I deleted the mail
files
On 2008-01-23, Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My emails are stored on an IMAP server and what you suggested wasn't
> I use Thunderbird as my mail client but have found that I needed to use
> Evolution to save the messages in mbox format, which was always a hassle.
"mbox" is already t
On 2008-01-23, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7k)
> and Junk (53.172k). The msf file must be some kind of index. I just feed
> the biggest one to sa-learn?
Yup. Use "sa-learn --spam --mbox Junk" to learn your spam. Yo
On 2008-01-23, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My intention was to manually feed the few spam messages that slip thru
>> undetected. By the time I get a hold of those, they are in the
>> recipient's mail client inbox, not in the server.
>> I was thinking, if I save the mail as EML
Mark Johnson wrote:
Depends on the client.
For instance, Thunderbird stores it's folders in mbox format, so
sa-learn can work against those files as-is. Other email clients can
save emails in text format complete with headers.
I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7
Depends on the client.
For instance, Thunderbird stores it's folders in mbox format, so
sa-learn can work against those files as-is. Other email clients can
save emails in text format complete with headers.
I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7k)
and Junk (53.172k
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Anthony Peacock escribió:
Well the short answer is, yes you can.
The slightly longer answer is that you won't get as good results
doing this, as the Bayes system uses tokens found in the complete
message. By only learning on the body you will not gain any
advantage for
Anthony Peacock escribió:
Well the short answer is, yes you can.
The slightly longer answer is that you won't get as good results
doing this, as the Bayes system uses tokens found in the complete
message. By only learning on the body you will not gain any
advantage for tokens found in header
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Anthony Peacock escribió:
Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body
of a message to sa-learn?
/Diego
Yes you can, who to stop it?
I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one
message.
I meant without the headers, just the
Anthony Peacock escribió:
Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body
of a message to sa-learn?
/Diego
Yes you can, who to stop it?
I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one
message.
I meant without the headers, just the body.
ok thanks
Wel
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Jari Fredriksson escribió:
Hey list,
Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body
of a message to sa-learn?
/Diego
Yes you can, who to stop it?
I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one
message.
I meant without the header
Jari Fredriksson escribió:
Hey list,
Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body
of a message to sa-learn?
/Diego
Yes you can, who to stop it?
I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one message.
I meant without the headers, just the body.
ok tha
> Hey list,
>
> Can I feed a plain text file representing just the body
> of a message to sa-learn?
>
> /Diego
Yes you can, who to stop it?
I just sent your message body as --ham, and it told it learned one message.
19 matches
Mail list logo
