On Sun, 25 Sep 2016, Alex wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 6:18 PM, John Hardin wrote:
BAYES_50? Are you training ham? :)
Yes :-) Does this hit bayes00 for you?
No, but if you were training things that looked like order confirmations
I'd expect that to have gotten a lower Bayes score...
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 6:18 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016, Alex wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Sean Greenslade
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:46:28PM -0400, Alex wrote:
I have another rule with a questionable score that's hitting too
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016, Alex wrote:
I have another rule with a questionable score that's hitting too much ham.
From: "Customer Support"
dbg: rules: ran header rule __FROM_WORDY ==> got hit: "Customer.Support@"
http://pastebin.com/3qw6jLZp
BAYES_50? Are you training ham? :)
--
John Hardi
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016, Alex wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Sean Greenslade
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:46:28PM -0400, Alex wrote:
I have another rule with a questionable score that's hitting too much ham.
From: "Customer Support"
dbg: rules: ran header rule __FROM_WORDY ==
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016, Alex wrote:
The rule has a purpose, so I don't want to zero-weight it (generally
speaking) every time there's a FP, particularly if those who
wrote/maintain the rules can investigate and adjust with their
specific knowledge.
Thanks for the notification. I'm reviewing the m
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Sean Greenslade
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:46:28PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have another rule with a questionable score that's hitting too much ham.
>>
>> From: "Customer Support"
>> dbg: rules: ran header rule __FROM_WORDY ==> got hit:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:46:28 -0400
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have another rule with a questionable score that's hitting too much
> ham.
>
> From: "Customer Support"
> dbg: rules: ran header rule __FROM_WORDY ==> got hit:
> "Customer.Support@"
>
> http://pastebin.com/3qw6jLZp
>
> This rule i
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:46:28PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have another rule with a questionable score that's hitting too much ham.
>
> From: "Customer Support"
> dbg: rules: ran header rule __FROM_WORDY ==> got hit: "Customer.Support@"
>
> http://pastebin.com/3qw6jLZp
>
> This rule